Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nazan Bautista

dblp:402/3364 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
AI education
0.912025
Understanding K-12 Teachers' Needs for AI Education: A Survey-Based Study · AAAI 2025
Computing education
teacher professional development
0.912025
Understanding K-12 Teachers' Needs for AI Education: A Survey-Based Study · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Understanding K-12 Teachers' Needs for AI Education: A Survey-Based Study
abstract
With the rapid rise of AI technologies such as ChatGPT, understanding and integrating AI into K-12 education has become increasingly important. However, teachers often lack the AI literacy necessary to navigate these tools, which can lead to the perpetuation of misconceptions and biases in the classroom. This study seeks to identify K-12 teachers’ self-identified needs regarding AI education and compare them with existing research on professional development (PD) for AI integration. We surveyed 34 K-12 teachers to assess their knowledge of AI, identify areas where they require further support, and evaluate the relevance of current PD offerings. Our findings reveal a significant disconnect between the top-down assumptions of expert-driven PD initiatives and the practical needs articulated by teachers. Key themes emerged, including a diverse range of AI understanding among educators, a strong preference for hands-on, practical training, and a demand for ongoing institutional support. Additionally, teachers expressed a desire for collaborative learning environments to share strategies and experiences related to AI. This study underscores the importance of tailoring PD programs to address the unique contexts and challenges faced by educators, advocating for a more personalized approach that fosters confidence and competence in AI integration. By aligning PD offerings with teachers’ needs, we aim to enhance their ability to effectively utilize AI tools in the classroom, ultimately enriching the educational experience for students.
Nazan Bautista, John Femiani 0001, Daniela Inclezan
AAAI1