EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rick Eason
dblp:402/3626
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 44% Distributed systems · 44% Energy-efficient computing · 13% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter architecture |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Architecting Space Microdatacenters: A System-level Approach · HPCA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
total cost of ownership analysis · 0.9architecture optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Architecting Space Microdatacenters: A System-level ApproachabstractServer-based computing in space has been recently proposed due to potential benefits in terms of capability, latency, security, sustainability, and cost. Despite this, there has been no work asking the question: how should we architect systems for server-based computing in space when considering overall cost. This paper presents a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)-based approach to architecture of server-based computing systems for space (Space Microdatacenters - SμDC) for processing data produced by low Earth orbit (LEO)-based Earth observation (EO) satellites. We show that power of compute is the primary factor in determining SμDC TCO, though the dependence is sublinear. Second, the impact of compute mass, monetary cost, and communication on TCO is relatively insignificant. Third, architectures with the highest $\frac{\text { FLOPs }}{{\mathrm {W}}}$ provide much higher performance per TCO ${\$}$ even if they have poor $\frac{\mathrm{FLOPs}}{\$}$. We leverage these insights to advocate extreme heterogeneity designs for SμDCs. These designs reduce SμDC TCO by 116× in spite of poor $\frac{\mathrm{FLOPs}}{\$}$ characteristics. We also show that (a) collaborative compute constellations — constellations in which EO satellites are also equipped with compute hardware — further improve SμDC TCO by 1.31 to 1.74×, (b) a distributed architecture reduces TCO by 10% over a monolithic architecture, and (c) low monetary cost of compute can be leveraged to provide near zero cost compute overprovisioning which improves an SμDC’s availability significantly and supports graceful degradation. Overall, this is the first paper on cost-aware architecture and optimization of a SμDC. Nathaniel Bleier, Rick Eason, Michael Lembeck, Rakesh Kumar 0002 |
HPCA | 2 |