Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hardy Chen

dblp:402/4108 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 30% Language models and text generation · 28% Reinforcement learning · 26%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question generation
clarification question generation
1.012026
Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
interactive question answering
1.012026
Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
1.012026
Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model
0.912025
ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
process supervision
0.912025
ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.912025
ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning from feedback · 1.0prompting · 1.0tree search · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers
abstract
Xin Chen, Feng Jiang, Yiqian Zhang, Hardy Chen, Shuo Yan, Wenya Xie, Min Yang, Shujian Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Xin Chen 0032, Feng Jiang 0007, Hardy Chen, Wenya Xie, Min Yang 0007, Shujian Huang
ACL (1)4
2025 ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling
abstract
Process-supervised reward models serve as a fine-grained function that provides detailed step-wise feedback to model responses, facilitating effective selection of reasoning trajectories for complex tasks.Despite its advantages, evaluation on PRMs remains less explored, especially in the multimodal domain.To address this gap, this paper first benchmarks current vision large language models (VLLMs) as two types of reward models: output reward models (ORMs) and process reward models (PRMs) on multiple vision-language benchmarks, which reveal that neither ORM nor PRM consistently outperforms across all tasks, and superior VLLMs do not necessarily yield better rewarding performance.To further advance evaluation, we introduce VILBENCH, a vision-language benchmark designed to require intensive process reward signals.Notably, Ope-nAI's GPT-4o with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) achieves only 27.3% accuracy, challenging current VLLMs.Lastly, we preliminarily showcase a promising pathway towards bridging the gap between general VLLMs and reward models-by collecting 73.6K vision-language process reward data using an enhanced treesearch algorithm, our 3B model is able to achieve an average improvement of 3.3% over standard CoT and up to 2.5% compared to its untrained counterpart on VILBENCH by selecting OpenAI o1's generations.We will release our code, model, and data at https: //ucsc-vlaa.github.io/ViLBench.
Haoqin Tu, Hardy Chen, Hui Liu 0033, Xianfeng Tang, Cihang Xie
EMNLP3
2025 MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria
abstract
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, Chenghao Zhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen 0002, Wenya Xie, ChenghaoZhu ChenghaoZhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhiyi Zhang 0007, Benyou Wang
NAACL (Long Papers)3