EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youngmin Im
dblp:402/5071
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-8652-0529ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › dynamic verification
runtime verification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VeriSafe Agent: Safeguarding Mobile GUI Agent via Logic-based Action Verification · MobiCom 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | VeriSafe Agent: Safeguarding Mobile GUI Agent via Logic-based Action Verification · MobiCom 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rule-based verification · 2.6formal specification · 2.6autoformalization · 2.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VeriSafe Agent: Safeguarding Mobile GUI Agent via Logic-based Action VerificationabstractLarge Foundation Models (LFMs) have unlocked new possibilities in human-computer interaction, particularly with the rise of mobile Graphical User Interface (GUI) Agents capable of interacting with mobile GUIs. These agents allow users to automate complex mobile tasks through simple natural language instructions. However, the inherent probabilistic nature of LFMs, coupled with the ambiguity and context-dependence of mobile tasks, makes LFM-based automation unreliable and prone to errors. To address this critical challenge, we introduce VeriSafe Agent (VSA)1: a formal verification system that serves as a logically grounded safeguard for Mobile GUI Agents. VSA deterministically ensures that an agent's actions strictly align with user intent before executing the action. At its core, VSA introduces a novel autoformalization technique that translates natural language user instructions into a formally verifiable specification. This enables runtime, rule-based verification of agent's actions, detecting erroneous actions even before they take effect. To the best of our knowledge, VSA is the first attempt to bring the rigor of formal verification to GUI agents, bridging the gap between LFM-driven actions and formal software verification. We implement VSA using off-the-shelf LFM services (GPT-4o) and evaluate its performance on 300 user instructions across 18 widely used mobile apps. The results demonstrate that VSA achieves 94.33%–98.33% accuracy in verifying agent actions, outperforming existing LFM-based verification methods by 30.00%–16.33%, and increases the GUI agent's task completion rate by 90%–130%. Jungjae Lee, Chihun Choi, Youngmin Im, Jaeyoung Wi, Kihong Heo, Sangeun Oh, Sunjae Lee, Insik Shin |
MobiCom | 4 |