Research and technological advancements have driven the development of wearable technology for stress management. Previous reviews primarily focused on its performance and effectiveness in health contexts. In contrast, this review takes a human-centric approach and reviews studies on users’ attitudes and experiences. We conducted a narrative review to identify (1) the facilitators and barriers of wearable stress management technology (WSMT) and (2) design considerations for human-centered WSMT. We identified 28 articles reporting user perspectives on stress management technology, primarily based on evaluation studies in which user perspectives were gathered through qualitative methods. We found five facilitators and barriers of WSMT (i.e., usefulness, functionality/interactivity, seamlessness, user privacy, and technology's image). Additionally, we synthesized 18 design considerations, highlighted two main design challenges, and proposed a value-sensitive approach for future research. This review adds to the HCI literature by demonstrating the complexity of designing human-centered WSMT and the need for actionable recommendations.

Abstract Stress-tracking technology is becoming widely available and accessible, offering non-invasive ways to monitor and regulate stress. Yet, current stress-tracking technology presents stress scores that lack transparency, informativeness, and nuance. This provocation paper discusses five key issues that the current stress-tracking technology should overcome, involving conceptualization, measurements, transparency, interpretation, and responsibility. Next, we provide three directions to overcome these issues and inform better stress-tracking practices and future research. Future stress technology should improve stress response measurements, use better terminology and data visualizations, and increase user involvement and transparency. We conclude that there is a pressing need for designers and researchers to take greater responsibility in creating stress-tracking technologies that are useful, fair and just, and centered around individuals’ needs.