Brian C. Bollen

dblp:403/0174 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 96% Geometric modeling and processing · 4%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
usability and user experience research
1.012026
ReVISit 2: A Full Experiment Life Cycle User Study Framework · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
user study methodology
1.012026
ReVISit 2: A Full Experiment Life Cycle User Study Framework · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization authoring
1.012026
ReVISit 2: A Full Experiment Life Cycle User Study Framework · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics › topological data analysis
merge tree comparison
0.712023
Computing a Stable Distance on Merge Trees · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics
topological data analysis
0.712023
Computing a Stable Distance on Merge Trees · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Empirical software engineering
reproducibility
0.312026
ReVISit 2: A Full Experiment Life Cycle User Study Framework · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis
shape comparison
0.212023
Computing a Stable Distance on Merge Trees · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

replication study · 2.0interviews · 2.0browser-based experimentation · 2.0stability proof · 0.7persistence simplification · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ReVISit 2: A Full Experiment Life Cycle User Study Framework
abstract
Online user studies of visualizations, visual encodings, and interaction techniques are ubiquitous in visualization research. Yet, designing, conducting, and analyzing studies effectively is still a major burden. Although various packages support such user studies, most solutions address only facets of the experiment life cycle, make reproducibility difficult, or do not cater to nuanced study designs or interactions. We introduce reVISit 2, a software framework that supports visualization researchers at all stages of designing and conducting browser-based user studies. ReVISit supports researchers in the design, debug & pilot, data collection, analysis, and dissemination experiment phases by providing both technical affordances (such as replay of participant interactions) and sociotechnical aids (such as a mindfully maintained community of support). It is a proven system that can be (and has been) used in publication-quality studies-which we demonstrate through a series of experimental replications. We reflect on the design of the system via interviews and an analysis of its technical dimensions. Through this work, we seek to elevate the ease with which studies are conducted, improve the reproducibility of studies within our community, and support the construction of advanced interactive studies.
Zach Cutler, Jack Wilburn, Hilson Shrestha, Yiren Ding, Brian C. Bollen, Khandaker Abrar Nadib, Tingying He, Andrew M. McNutt, Lane Harrison, Alexander Lex
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.5
2023 Computing a Stable Distance on Merge Trees
abstract
Distances on merge trees facilitate visual comparison of collections of scalar fields. Two desirable properties for these distances to exhibit are 1) the ability to discern between scalar fields which other, less complex topological summaries cannot and 2) to still be robust to perturbations in the dataset. The combination of these two properties, known respectively as stability and discriminativity, has led to theoretical distances which are either thought to be or shown to be computationally complex and thus their implementations have been scarce. In order to design similarity measures on merge trees which are computationally feasible for more complex merge trees, many researchers have elected to loosen the restrictions on at least one of these two properties. The question still remains, however, if there are practical situations where trading these desirable properties is necessary. Here we construct a distance between merge trees which is designed to retain both discriminativity and stability. While our approach can be expensive for large merge trees, we illustrate its use in a setting where the number of nodes is small. This setting can be made more practical since we also provide a proof that persistence simplification increases the outputted distance by at most half of the simplified value. We demonstrate our distance measure on applications in shape comparison and on detection of periodicity in the von Kármán vortex street.
Brian C. Bollen, Pasindu Tennakoon, Joshua A. Levine
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1