Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hrishikesh Balakrishnan
dblp:403/5058
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-6019-1259ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › program logic
separation logic |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FO-Complete Program Verification for Heap Logics · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Program verification › deductive verification
verification condition generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FO-Complete Program Verification for Heap Logics · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
SMT solver · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FO-Complete Program Verification for Heap LogicsabstractProgram verification techniques for expressive heap logics are inevitably incomplete. In this work we argue that algorithmic techniques for reasoning with expressive heap logics can be held up to a different robust theoretical standard for completeness: FO-Completeness. FO-completeness is a theoretical guarantee that all theorems that are valid when recursive definitions are interpreted as fixpoint definitions (instead of least fixpoint) are guaranteed to be eventually proven by the system. We illustrate a set of principles to design such logics and develop the first two heap logics that have implicit heaplets and that admit FO-Complete program verification. The logics we develop are a frame logic (FL) and a separation logic (SL-FL) that has an alternate semantics inspired by frame logic. We show a verification condition generation technique that is amenable to FO-complete reasoning using quantifier instantiation and SMT solvers. We implement tools that realize our technique and show the expressiveness of our logics and the efficacy of the verification technique on a suite of benchmarks that manipulate data structures. Adithya Murali, Hrishikesh Balakrishnan, Aaron Councilman, P. Madhusudan |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |