Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Defne Siir Faydali

dblp:404/5516 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › human behavior modeling › social perception
social perception of robots
0.912025
Distraction by a Human or a Robot: Effects of Perceptual Load and Action Type · HRI 2025
Human-robot interaction
communicative action
0.312025
Distraction by a Human or a Robot: Effects of Perceptual Load and Action Type · HRI 2025
Human-robot interaction
robot communication
0.312025
Distraction by a Human or a Robot: Effects of Perceptual Load and Action Type · HRI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perceptual load paradigm · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Distraction by a Human or a Robot: Effects of Perceptual Load and Action Type
abstract
This study investigates how humans process and attend to robot actions compared to human actions under varying cognitive demands. Using a perceptual load paradigm, we examined whether robots capture attention similarly to humans and how this is influenced by the nature of their actions. Participants performed a letter detection task while being presented with task-irrelevant videos of either human or robot agents performing communicative or noncommunicative actions. Results demonstrated that both humans and robots captured attention through their actions, particularly when these actions were communicative. Under high perceptual load conditions, human distractors caused more interference than robot distractors, suggesting that agent identity becomes particularly important when cognitive resources are limited. These findings provide insights into how humans process robot actions in attentiondemanding situations and may have important implications for designing robot behaviors in operational contexts.
Ataol Burak Özsu, Tugçe Nur Pekçetin, Defne Siir Faydali, Burcu A. Urgen
HRI3