Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karen Shirai

dblp:404/6029 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
robot perception
0.912025
Understanding Humans' Perception of Robots by Means of "Paul A. Weiss' Thought Experiment" · HRI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thought experiment · 0.9correspondence analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Understanding Humans' Perception of Robots by Means of "Paul A. Weiss' Thought Experiment"
abstract
We explored extracting users' true latent and implicit perceptions of robots by means of “Paul A. Weiss' Thought Experiment,” which considers the relationship between the elements, organization, and function of an object. We focused on three target objects appearing in a story: “computer;” “human being;” and “robot.” Participants were asked to answer the question “What was ‘lost’ as a result of the target object being homogenized/pulverized?” The results of a correspondence analysis on the answers for the three objects clarified the participants' ambiguous and contradictory perceptions of robots, that is, “robots are neither humans nor computers” but “robots are somehow similar to humans and computers.”
Takanori Komatsu, Karen Shirai
HRI2