Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chen-Jui Tu
dblp:404/9604
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 77% Memory systems · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › data reduction
data deduplication |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025 |
Memory systems › data movement
data relocation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025 |
Storage systems › magnetic storage
hard disk drive |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025 |
Storage systems › magnetic recording
interlaced magnetic recording |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reference-count-based data relocation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic RecordingabstractInterlaced Magnetic Recording (IMR) drives have been regarded as promising hard disk drives (HDDs) to meet the ever-growing storage demand in the post-AI era. Among various technologies, IMR drives achieve increased storage capacity by overlapping tracks in an interlaced fashion; however, updating data on overlapped tracks necessitates rewriting up to two tracks, which can degrade performance. Previous strategies have attempted to reduce track rewrites by either delaying the timing of overlapping based on storage space usage or relocating frequently updated data to non-overlapped tracks through update-frequency-based hot/cold data separation. In contrast, this paper proposes a novel approach that leverages data deduplication as a natural solution to the rewrite challenge in IMR drives. Unlike conventional hot/cold separation, this paper utilizes deduplication metadata, specifically reference counts, as a direct indicator for data relocation. The rationale behind the proposed approach is that deduplicated data, which remains static unless reference counts drop to one, can be stored or migrated to overlapped tracks without inducing future track rewrites. The proposed approach diverges from traditional frequency tracking methods by leveraging data deduplication information to guide data placement and reduce rewriting. Evaluation results show that the proposed scheme effectively reduces the accumulated read/write latency by $37.57 \%$ on average compared with state-of-the-art data management on IMR drives with data deduplication enabled. Chen-Jui Tu, Shuo-Han Chen |
DAC | 1 |