Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chen-Jui Tu

dblp:404/9604 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 77% Memory systems · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › data reduction
data deduplication
0.912025
Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025
Memory systems › data movement
data relocation
0.912025
Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025
Storage systems › magnetic storage
hard disk drive
0.912025
Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025
Storage systems › magnetic recording
interlaced magnetic recording
0.912025
Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.312025
Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording · DAC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reference-count-based data relocation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Enabling Data-Deduplication-Assisted Data Relocation for Interlaced Magnetic Recording
abstract
Interlaced Magnetic Recording (IMR) drives have been regarded as promising hard disk drives (HDDs) to meet the ever-growing storage demand in the post-AI era. Among various technologies, IMR drives achieve increased storage capacity by overlapping tracks in an interlaced fashion; however, updating data on overlapped tracks necessitates rewriting up to two tracks, which can degrade performance. Previous strategies have attempted to reduce track rewrites by either delaying the timing of overlapping based on storage space usage or relocating frequently updated data to non-overlapped tracks through update-frequency-based hot/cold data separation. In contrast, this paper proposes a novel approach that leverages data deduplication as a natural solution to the rewrite challenge in IMR drives. Unlike conventional hot/cold separation, this paper utilizes deduplication metadata, specifically reference counts, as a direct indicator for data relocation. The rationale behind the proposed approach is that deduplicated data, which remains static unless reference counts drop to one, can be stored or migrated to overlapped tracks without inducing future track rewrites. The proposed approach diverges from traditional frequency tracking methods by leveraging data deduplication information to guide data placement and reduce rewriting. Evaluation results show that the proposed scheme effectively reduces the accumulated read/write latency by $37.57 \%$ on average compared with state-of-the-art data management on IMR drives with data deduplication enabled.
Chen-Jui Tu, Shuo-Han Chen
DAC1