Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuanjun Chai
dblp:404/9938
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network › GAN training
mode collapse |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond) · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › generative model safety
vision-language model safety |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-Based Attacks · ICCV 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-Based Attacks · ICCV 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
jailbreak defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-Based Attacks · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
preference evaluation · 1.7noise-augmented fine-tuning · 1.7human annotation · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-Based AttacksabstractVision-Language Models (VLMs) extend the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating visual information, yet they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, especially when processing noisy or corrupted images. Although existing VLMs adopt security measures during training to mitigate such attacks, vulnerabilities associated with noise-augmented visual inputs are overlooked. In this work, we identify that missing noise-augmented training causes critical security gaps: many VLMs are susceptible to even simple perturbations such as Gaussian noise. To address this challenge, we propose Robust-VLGuard, a multimodal safety dataset with aligned / misaligned image-text pairs, combined with noise-augmented fine-tuning that reduces attack success rates while preserving functionality of VLM. For stronger optimization-based visual perturbation attacks, we propose DiffPure-VLM, leveraging diffusion models to convert adversarial perturbations into Gaussian-like noise, which can be defended by VLMs with noise-augmented safety fine-tuning. Experimental results demonstrate that the distribution-shifting property of diffusion model aligns well with our fine-tuned VLMs, significantly mitigating adversarial perturbations across varying intensities. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/JarvisUSTC/DiffPure-RobustVLM. Yushen Zuo, Yuanjun Chai, Yicheng Fu, Yichun Feng, Kin-Man Lam 0001 |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2025 | Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond)abstractLarge language models (LMs) often struggle to generate diverse, human-like creative content, raising concerns about the long-term homogenization of human thought through repeated exposure to similar outputs. Yet scalable methods for evaluating LM output diversity remain limited, especially beyond narrow tasks such as random number or name generation, or beyond repeated sampling from a single model. To address this gap, we introduce Infinity-Chat, a large-scale dataset of 26K diverse, real-world, open-ended user queries that admit a wide range of plausible answers with no single ground truth. We introduce the first comprehensive taxonomy for characterizing the full spectrum of open-ended prompts posed to LMs, comprising 6 top-level categories (e.g., creative content generation, brainstorm & ideation) that further breaks down to 17 subcategories. Using Infinity-Chat, we present a large-scale study of mode collapse in LMs, revealing a pronounced Artificial Hivemind effect in open-ended generation of LMs, characterized by (1) intra-model repetition, where a single model consistently generates similar responses, and more so (2) inter-model homogeneity, where different models produce strikingly similar outputs. Infinity-Chat also includes 31,250 human annotations, across absolute ratings and pairwise preferences, with 25 independent human annotations per example. This enables studying collective and individual-specific human preferences in response to open-ended queries. Our findings show that state-of-the-art LMs, reward models, and LM judges are less well calibrated to human ratings on model generations that elicit differing idiosyncratic annotator preferences, despite maintaining comparable overall quality. Overall, INFINITY-CHAT presents the first large-scale resource for systematically studying real-world open-ended queries to LMs, revealing critical insights to guide future research for mitigating long-term AI safety risks posed by the Artificial Hivemind. Yuanjun Chai, Margaret Li, Mickel Liu, Raymond Fok, Nouha Dziri, Yulia Tsvetkov, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |