Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yiling Xue

dblp:405/1138 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
falsification
1.012026
Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier Certificates · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification
0.312026
Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier Certificates · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

satisfiability modulo theories · 2.0optimization · 2.0ReLU neural network · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier Certificates
abstract
Barrier certificates play an important role in verifying the safety of continuous-time systems, including autonomous driving, robotic manipulators and other critical applications. Recently, ReLU neural barrier certificates---barrier certificates represented by the ReLU neural networks---have attracted significant attention in the safe control community due to their promising performance. However, because of the approximate nature of neural networks, rigorous verification methods are required to ensure the correctness of these certificates. This paper presents a necessary and sufficient condition for verifying the correctness of ReLU neural barrier certificates. The proposed condition can be encoded as either an Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) or optimization problem, enabling both verification and falsification. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach capable of falsifying ReLU neural barrier certificates. Numerical experiments demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method in both verifying and falsifying such certificates.
Dejin Ren, Yiling Xue, Taoran Wu, Bai Xue 0001
AAAI2