Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yiling Xue
dblp:405/1138
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
falsification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier Certificates · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier Certificates · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
satisfiability modulo theories · 2.0optimization · 2.0ReLU neural network · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier CertificatesabstractBarrier certificates play an important role in verifying the safety of continuous-time systems, including autonomous driving, robotic manipulators and other critical applications. Recently, ReLU neural barrier certificates---barrier certificates represented by the ReLU neural networks---have attracted significant attention in the safe control community due to their promising performance. However, because of the approximate nature of neural networks, rigorous verification methods are required to ensure the correctness of these certificates. This paper presents a necessary and sufficient condition for verifying the correctness of ReLU neural barrier certificates. The proposed condition can be encoded as either an Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) or optimization problem, enabling both verification and falsification. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach capable of falsifying ReLU neural barrier certificates. Numerical experiments demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method in both verifying and falsifying such certificates. Dejin Ren, Yiling Xue, Taoran Wu, Bai Xue 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |