Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Irene Pi
dblp:405/3768
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AgMMU: A Comprehensive Agricultural Multimodal Understanding Benchmark · NeurIPS 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics › agriculture
agricultural informatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AgMMU: A Comprehensive Agricultural Multimodal Understanding Benchmark · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 1.7knowledge distillation · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AgMMU: A Comprehensive Agricultural Multimodal Understanding BenchmarkabstractWe present AgMMU, a challenging real‑world benchmark for evaluating and advancing vision-language models (VLMs) in the knowledge‑intensive domain of agriculture. Unlike prior datasets that rely on crowdsourced prompts, AgMMU is distilled from 116,231 authentic dialogues between everyday growers and USDA-authorized Cooperative Extension experts. Through a three‑stage pipeline: automated knowledge extraction, QA generation, and human verification, we construct (i) AgMMU, an evaluation set of 746 multiple‑choice questions (MCQs) and 746 open‑ended questions (OEQs), and (ii) AgBase, a development corpus of 57,079 multimodal facts covering five high-stakes agricultural topics: insect identification, species identification, disease categorization, symptom description, and management instruction. AgMMU has three key advantages:- Authentic & Expert‑Verified: All facts, images, and answers originate from real farmer and gardener inquiries answered by credentialed specialists, ensuring high‑fidelity agricultural knowledge.- Complete Development Suite: AgMMU uniquely couples a dual‑format evaluation benchmark (MCQ and OEQ) with AgBase, a large‑scale training set, enabling both rigorous assessment and targeted improvement of VLMs.- Knowledge‑intensive Challenge: Our tasks demand the synergy of nuanced visual perception and domain expertise, exposing fundamental limitations of current general‑purpose models and charting a path toward robust, application‑ready agricultural AI.Benchmarking 12 leading VLMs reveals pronounced gaps in fine‑grained perception and factual grounding. Open‑sourced models trail after proprietary ones by a wide margin. Simple fine‑tuning on AgBase boosts open-sourced model performance on challenging OEQs for up to 11.6\% on average, narrowing this gap and also motivating future research to propose better strategies in knowledge extraction and distillation from AgBase. We hope AgMMU stimulates research on domain‑specific knowledge integration and trustworthy decision support in agriculture AI development. Aruna Gauba, Irene Pi, Yunze Man, Ziqi Pang, Vikram S. Adve, Yu-Xiong Wang |
NeurIPS | 2 |