EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhangyi Liu
dblp:405/6900
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › continuous-time analysis
mean-field langevin dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Mean-Field Langevin Stochastic Descent-Ascent for Distributional Minimax Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Mean-Field Langevin Stochastic Descent-Ascent for Distributional Minimax Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent ascent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convergence of Mean-Field Langevin Stochastic Descent-Ascent for Distributional Minimax Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mean-field langevin · 0.9convergence analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Convergence of Mean-Field Langevin Stochastic Descent-Ascent for Distributional Minimax OptimizationabstractWe study convergence properties of the discrete-time Mean-Field Langevin Stochastic Gradient Descent-Ascent (MFL-SGDA) algorithm for solving distributional minimax optimization. These problems arise in various applications, such as zero-sum games, generative adversarial networks and distributionally robust learning. Despite the significance of MFL-SGDA in these contexts, the discrete-time convergence rate remains underexplored. To address this gap, we establish a last-iterate convergence rate of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ for MFL-SGDA. This rate is nearly optimal when compared to the complexity lower bound of its Euclidean counterpart. This rate also matches the complexity of mean-field Langevin stochastic gradient descent for distributional minimization and the outer-loop iteration complexity of an existing double-loop algorithm for distributional minimax problems. By leveraging an elementary analysis framework that avoids PDE-based techniques, we overcome previous limitations and achieve a faster convergence rate. Zhangyi Liu, Rui Gao 0001, Shuang Li 0002 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | PHYBench: Holistic Evaluation of Physical Perception and Reasoning in Large Language ModelsabstractCurrent benchmarks for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant limitations: task oversimplification, data contamination, and flawed evaluation items. These deficiencies necessitate more rigorous assessment methods. To address these limitations, we introduce PHYBench, a benchmark of 500 original physics problems ranging from high school to Physics Olympiad difficulty. PHYBench addresses data contamination through original content and employs a systematic curation pipeline to eliminate flawed items. Evaluations show that PHYBench activates more tokens and provides stronger differentiation between reasoning models compared to other baselines like AIME 2024, OlympiadBench and GPQA. Even the best-performing model, Gemini 2.5 Pro, achieves only 36.9\% accuracy compared to human experts' 61.9\%. To further enhance evaluation precision, we introduce the Expression Edit Distance (EED) Score for mathematical expression assessment, which improves sample efficiency by 204\% over binary scoring. Moreover, PHYBench effectively elicits multi-step and multi-condition reasoning, providing a platform for examining models' reasoning robustness, preferences, and deficiencies. The benchmark results and dataset are publicly available at https://www.phybench.cn/. Shi Qiu 0016, Shaoyang Guo, Zhuo-Yang Song, Yunbo Sun, Jiashen Wei, Tianyu Luo, Yixuan Yin 0003, Haoxu Zhang, Chencheng Tang, Haoling Chang, Jingtian Zhang, Zhangyi Liu, Yuku Zhang, Boxuan Jing, Xianqi Yin, Yutong Ren, Zizhuo Fu, Jiaming Ji, Anqi Lv, Laifu Man, Jianxiang Li, Feiyu Tao, Qihua Sun, Zhou Liang, Yushu Mu, Zhongxuan Li, Jing-Jun Zhang, Xingqi Xia, Zheyu Shen, Jiahang Chen, Qiuhao Xiong, Binran Wang, Fengyuan Wang, Ziyang Ni, Fan Cui, Changkun Shao, Qing-Hong Cao, Ming-xing Luo, Muhan Zhang, Hua Xing Zhu |
NeurIPS | 18 |