Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Harry Mead

dblp:405/8284 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 84% Learning paradigms · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning › risk-sensitive reinforcement learning
conditional value-at-risk
0.912025
Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
0.912025
Improving Regret Approximation for Unsupervised Dynamic Environment Generation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.912025
Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
risk-sensitive reinforcement learning
0.912025
Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency
0.912025
Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment › environment design
unsupervised environment design
0.912025
Improving Regret Approximation for Unsupervised Dynamic Environment Generation · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

return capping · 0.9policy gradient · 0.9maximised negative advantage · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation
abstract
When optimising for conditional value at risk (CVaR) using policy gradients (PG), current methods rely on discarding a large proportion of trajectories, resulting in poor sample efficiency. We propose a reformulation of the CVaR optimisation problem by capping the total return of trajectories used in training, rather than simply discarding them, and show that this is equivalent to the original problem if the cap is set appropriately. We show, with empirical results in an number of environments, that this reformulation of the problem results in consistently improved performance compared to baselines. We have made all our code available here: https://github.com/HarryMJMead/cvar-return-capping.
Harry Mead, Clarissa Costen, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
ICML1
2025 Improving Regret Approximation for Unsupervised Dynamic Environment Generation
abstract
Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) seeks to automatically generate training curricula for reinforcement learning (RL) agents, with the goal of improving generalisation and zero-shot performance. However, designing effective curricula remains a difficult problem, particularly in settings where small subsets of environment parameterisations result in significant increases in the complexity of the required policy. Current methods struggle with a difficult credit assignment problem and rely on regret approximations that fail to identify challenging levels, both of which are compounded as the size of the environment grows. We propose Dynamic Environment Generation for UED (DEGen) to enable a denser level generator reward signal, reducing the difficulty of credit assignment and allowing for UED to scale to larger environment sizes. We also introduce a new regret approximation, Maximised Negative Advantage (MNA), as a significantly improved metric to optimise for, that better identifies more challenging levels. We show empirically that MNA outperforms current regret approximations and when combined with DEGen, consistently outperforms existing methods, especially as the size of the environment grows. We have made all our code available here: \url{https://github.com/HarryMJMead/Dynamic-Environment-Generation-for-UED}.
Harry Mead, Bruno Lacerda, Jakob N. Foerster, Nick Hawes
NeurIPS1