EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Harry Mead
dblp:405/8284
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 84% Learning paradigms · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning › risk-sensitive reinforcement learning
conditional value-at-risk |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Regret Approximation for Unsupervised Dynamic Environment Generation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
risk-sensitive reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient Optimisation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment › environment design
unsupervised environment design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Regret Approximation for Unsupervised Dynamic Environment Generation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
return capping · 0.9policy gradient · 0.9maximised negative advantage · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Return Capping: Sample Efficient CVaR Policy Gradient OptimisationabstractWhen optimising for conditional value at risk (CVaR) using policy gradients (PG), current methods rely on discarding a large proportion of trajectories, resulting in poor sample efficiency. We propose a reformulation of the CVaR optimisation problem by capping the total return of trajectories used in training, rather than simply discarding them, and show that this is equivalent to the original problem if the cap is set appropriately. We show, with empirical results in an number of environments, that this reformulation of the problem results in consistently improved performance compared to baselines. We have made all our code available here: https://github.com/HarryMJMead/cvar-return-capping. Harry Mead, Clarissa Costen, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Improving Regret Approximation for Unsupervised Dynamic Environment GenerationabstractUnsupervised Environment Design (UED) seeks to automatically generate training curricula for reinforcement learning (RL) agents, with the goal of improving generalisation and zero-shot performance. However, designing effective curricula remains a difficult problem, particularly in settings where small subsets of environment parameterisations result in significant increases in the complexity of the required policy. Current methods struggle with a difficult credit assignment problem and rely on regret approximations that fail to identify challenging levels, both of which are compounded as the size of the environment grows. We propose Dynamic Environment Generation for UED (DEGen) to enable a denser level generator reward signal, reducing the difficulty of credit assignment and allowing for UED to scale to larger environment sizes. We also introduce a new regret approximation, Maximised Negative Advantage (MNA), as a significantly improved metric to optimise for, that better identifies more challenging levels. We show empirically that MNA outperforms current regret approximations and when combined with DEGen, consistently outperforms existing methods, especially as the size of the environment grows. We have made all our code available here: \url{https://github.com/HarryMJMead/Dynamic-Environment-Generation-for-UED}. Harry Mead, Bruno Lacerda, Jakob N. Foerster, Nick Hawes |
NeurIPS | 1 |