Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kabir Khandpur
dblp:405/8803
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 61% Software testing · 30% Empirical software engineering · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
software engineering agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9execution environments · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering AgentsabstractDespite recent progress in Language Models (LMs) for software engineering, collecting training data remains a significant pain point.Existing datasets are small, with at most 1,000s of training instances from 11 or fewer GitHub repositories.The procedures to curate such datasets are often complex, necessitating hundreds of hours of human labor; companion execution environments also take up several terabytes of storage, severely limiting their scalability and usability.To address this pain point, we introduce SWE-smith, a novel pipeline for generating software engineering training data at scale.Given any Python codebase, SWE-smith constructs a corresponding execution environment, then automatically synthesizes 100s to 1,000s of task instances that break existing test(s) in the codebase.Using SWE-smith, we create a dataset of 50k instances sourced from 128 GitHub repositories, an order of magnitude larger than all previous works.We train SWE-agent-LM-32B, achieving 40.2% Pass@1 resolve rate on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark, state of the art among open source models.We open source SWE-smith (collection procedure, task instances, trajectories, models) to lower the barrier of entry for research in LM systems for automated software engineering.All assets available at \url{https://swesmith.com}. John Yang 0002, Kilian Lieret, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kabir Khandpur, Binyuan Hui, Ofir Press, Ludwig Schmidt, Diyi Yang |
NeurIPS | 5 |