Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Runbo Li

dblp:406/8720 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-0292-7451ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 89% Image recognition and object detection · 6% Autonomous driving · 5%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial patch defense
1.922026
False Positives Matter: Multidimensional Localization Evaluation and Training-Free Explainable Adversarial Patch Defense · AAAI 2026
Multi-Task Robustness Enhancement Framework against Various Adversarial Patches · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.922026
False Positives Matter: Multidimensional Localization Evaluation and Training-Free Explainable Adversarial Patch Defense · AAAI 2026
Multi-Task Robustness Enhancement Framework against Various Adversarial Patches · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
False Positives Matter: Multidimensional Localization Evaluation and Training-Free Explainable Adversarial Patch Defense · AAAI 2026
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
perception robustness
0.312025
Multi-Task Robustness Enhancement Framework against Various Adversarial Patches · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.0text-guided inpainting · 1.0patch reasoning chain · 1.0self-supervised learning · 0.9patch inpainting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 False Positives Matter: Multidimensional Localization Evaluation and Training-Free Explainable Adversarial Patch Defense
abstract
Adversarial patch attacks pose a significant threat to visual systems. While current patch purification-based defense methods enhance core metrics of visual perception models, they overlook the critical issue of false positive patches, severely compromising image usability. This paper reveals the inadequacy of existing evaluations for adversarial patch defenses, and pioneers a multidimensional adversarial patch localization evaluation framework, which comprehensively quantifies false positives, recall capability, and overall localization accuracy, providing a novel perspective for comparative analysis within the field. Furthermore, building upon the observation that false positives stem from a lack of semantic understanding, we propose a Semantic-Aware Training-free Explainable Defense method (SATED). SATED achieves zero-shot patch localization, false detection correction, and decision explanation by constructing a patch reasoning chain, while simultaneously performing integrated text-guided patch inpainting. Extensive experiments across digital and physical scenarios, detection and segmentation tasks, and diverse adversarial patches, demonstrate that our method significantly reduces false positives and doubles the overall patch localization accuracy, boosting both the generalizability and explainability of the defense.
Lihua Jing, Rui Wang 0032, Jinwen Zhong, Runbo Li, Zixuan Zhu 0002
AAAI4
2025 Multi-Task Robustness Enhancement Framework against Various Adversarial Patches
abstract
Autonomous systems leveraging visual perception face a rising threat from adversarial patches, jeopardizing their robustness. Existing defense methods adaptable to various pre-trained models typically rely on observed patch characteristics or prior attack data, having difficulty adapting to new threats. This study innovatively focuses on modeling patch attack behavior instead of existing patches, proposing a unified robustness enhancement framework against various adversarial patches. Through self-supervised learning, we accurately locate diverse adversarial patches without prior attack knowledge. Furthermore, we introduce an efficient adaptive patch inpainting method to mitigate patch impact while maintaining visual coherence. Experiments show that our methods effectively boost the robustness of visual perception models against various adversarial patches across different tasks.
Lihua Jing, Rui Wang 0032, Runbo Li, Zixuan Zhu 0002, Xingxing Wei 0001
ICRA3