Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Quy Duong Dang

dblp:407/6785 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
grounded visual question answering
0.912025
Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering · IJCAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
medical visual question answering
0.912025
Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering · IJCAI 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.312025
Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large multimodal model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering
abstract
Medical Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in medical data interpretation. However, these models frequently generate hallucinations contradicting source evidence, particularly due to inadequate localization reasoning. This work reveals a critical limitation in current medical LMMs: instead of analyzing relevant pathological regions, they often rely on linguistic patterns or attend to irrelevant image areas when responding to disease-related queries. To address this, we introduce HEAL-MedVQA (Hallucination Evaluation via Localization MedVQA), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LMMs' localization abilities and hallucination robustness. HEAL-MedVQA features (i) two innovative evaluation protocols to assess visual and textual shortcut learning, and (ii) a dataset of 67K VQA pairs, with doctor-annotated anatomical segmentation masks for pathological regions. To improve visual reasoning, we propose the Localize-before-Answer (LobA) framework, which trains LMMs to localize target regions of interest and self-prompt to emphasize segmented pathological areas, generating grounded and reliable answers. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art biomedical LMMs on the challenging HEAL-MedVQA benchmark, advancing robustness in medical VQA.
Minh Khoi Ho, Ta Duc Huy, Thanh Tam Nguyen, Qi Chen 0014, Kumar Rav, Quy Duong Dang, Satwik Ramchandre, Son Lam Phung, Zhibin Liao, Minh-Son To, Johan Verjans, Phi-Le Nguyen, Vu Minh Hieu Phan
IJCAI7