Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Quy Duong Dang
dblp:407/6785
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
grounded visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering · IJCAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
medical visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering · IJCAI 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question Answering · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large multimodal model · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Localizing Before Answering: A Benchmark for Grounded Medical Visual Question AnsweringabstractMedical Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in medical data interpretation. However, these models frequently generate hallucinations contradicting source evidence, particularly due to inadequate localization reasoning. This work reveals a critical limitation in current medical LMMs: instead of analyzing relevant pathological regions, they often rely on linguistic patterns or attend to irrelevant image areas when responding to disease-related queries. To address this, we introduce HEAL-MedVQA (Hallucination Evaluation via Localization MedVQA), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LMMs' localization abilities and hallucination robustness. HEAL-MedVQA features (i) two innovative evaluation protocols to assess visual and textual shortcut learning, and (ii) a dataset of 67K VQA pairs, with doctor-annotated anatomical segmentation masks for pathological regions. To improve visual reasoning, we propose the Localize-before-Answer (LobA) framework, which trains LMMs to localize target regions of interest and self-prompt to emphasize segmented pathological areas, generating grounded and reliable answers. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art biomedical LMMs on the challenging HEAL-MedVQA benchmark, advancing robustness in medical VQA. Minh Khoi Ho, Ta Duc Huy, Thanh Tam Nguyen, Qi Chen 0014, Kumar Rav, Quy Duong Dang, Satwik Ramchandre, Son Lam Phung, Zhibin Liao, Minh-Son To, Johan Verjans, Phi-Le Nguyen, Vu Minh Hieu Phan |
IJCAI | 7 |