Small language models (SLMs) enable scalable tool-augmented multi-agent systems where multiple SLMs handle subtasks orchestrated by a powerful coordinator.However, they struggle with tool-use tasks, particularly in selecting appropriate tools and identifying correct parameters.A common failure mode is schema misalignment: models hallucinate plausible tool names that are absent from the provided tool schema, due to different naming conventions internalized during pretraining.Rather than training models to adapt to unfamiliar schemas, we propose adapting schemas to align with models' pretrained knowledge.We introduce PA-Tool (Pretraining-Aligned Tool Schema Generation), a training-free method that leverages peakedness, a signal used in contamination detection that indicates pretraining familiarity, to rename tool components.By generating multiple candidates and selecting the candidate with the highest peakedness, PA-Tool identifies pretrainingaligned naming patterns.Experiments on Meta-Tool and RoTBench show improvements of up to 17%, with schema misalignment errors reduced by 80%.PA-Tool enables small models to substantially improve tool-use accuracy without retraining, showing that schema-level interventions can unlock the tool-use potential of resource-efficient models.Our code is available at https://github.com/holi-lab/P A-Tool.

Abstract As psychometric surveys are increasingly used to assess the traits of large language models (LLMs), the need for scalable survey item generation suited for LLMs has also grown. A critical challenge here is ensuring the construct validity of generated items, i.e., whether they truly measure the intended trait. Traditionally, this requires costly, large-scale human data collection. To make it efficient, we present a framework for virtual respondent simulation using LLMs. Our central idea is to account for mediators: factors through which the same trait can give rise to varying responses to a survey item. By simulating respondents with diverse mediators, we identify survey items that yield responses robustly correlated with intended traits across these mediators. Experiments on three psychological trait theories (Big5, Schwartz, VIA) show that our mediator generation methods and simulation framework effectively identify high-validity items. LLMs demonstrate the ability to generate plausible mediators from trait definitions and to simulate respondent behavior for item validation. Our problem formulation, metrics, methodology, and dataset open a new direction for cost-efficient survey development and a deeper understanding of how LLMs simulate human survey responses. We release our dataset and code to support future work.1

The importance of benchmarks for assessing the values of language models has been pronounced due to the growing need of more authentic, human-aligned responses.However, existing benchmarks rely on human or machine annotations that are vulnerable to value-related biases.Furthermore, the tested scenarios often diverge from real-world contexts in which models are commonly used to generate text and express values.To address these issues, we propose the Value Portrait benchmark, a reliable framework for evaluating LLMs' value orientations with two key characteristics.First, the benchmark consists of items that capture real-life user-LLM interactions, enhancing the relevance of assessment results to real-world LLM usage.Second, each item is rated by human subjects based on its similarity to their own thoughts, and correlations between these ratings and the subjects' actual value scores are derived.This psychometrically validated approach ensures that items strongly correlated with specific values serve as reliable items for assessing those values.Through evaluating 44 LLMs with our benchmark, we find that these models prioritize Benevolence, Security, and Self-Direction values while placing less emphasis on Tradition, Power, and Achievement values.Also, our analysis reveals biases in how LLMs perceive various demographic groups, deviating from real human data. 1