Vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP have been widely used in various specific tasks. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as prompt and adapter tuning, have become key techniques for adapting these models to specific domains. However, existing approaches rely on prior knowledge to manually identify the locations requiring fine-tuning. Adaptively selecting which parameters in VLMs should be tuned remains unexplored. In this paper, we propose CLIP with Adaptive Selective Tuning (CLIP-AST), which can be used to automatically select critical parameters in VLMs for fine-tuning for specific tasks. It opportunely leverages the adaptive learning rate in the optimizer and improves model performance without extra parameter overhead. We conduct extensive experiments on 13 benchmarks, such as ImageNet, Food101, Flowers102, etc, with different settings, including few-shot learning, base-to-novel class generalization, and out-of-distribution. The results show that CLIP-AST consistently outperforms the original CLIP model as well as its variants and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in all cases. For example, with the 16-shot learning, CLIP-AST surpasses GraphAdapter and PromptSRC by 3.56% and 2.20% in average accuracy on 11 datasets, respectively. Code will be publicly available.

Reasoning stands as a cornerstone of intelligence, enabling the synthesis of existing knowledge to solve complex problems. Despite remarkable progress, existing reasoning benchmarks often fail to rigorously evaluate the nuanced reasoning capabilities required for complex, real-world problemsolving, particularly in multi-disciplinary and multimodal contexts. In this paper, we introduce a graduate-level, multi-disciplinary, EnglishChinese benchmark, dubbed as Reasoning Bench (RBench), for assessing the reasoning capability of both language and multimodal models. RBench spans 1,094 questions across 108 subjects for language model evaluation and 665 questions across 83 subjects for multimodal model testing. These questions are meticulously curated to ensure rigorous difficulty calibration, subject balance, and cross-linguistic alignment, enabling the assessment to be an Olympiad-level multidisciplinary benchmark. We evaluate many models such as o1, GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, etc. Experimental results indicate that advanced models perform poorly on complex reasoning, especially multimodal reasoning. Even the top-performing model OpenAI o1 achieves only 53.2% accuracy on our multimodal evaluation. Data and code are made publicly available athttps://evalmodels.github.io/rbench/