Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chebrolu Niranjan

dblp:407/7013 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
jailbreak defense
1.012026
Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering › language model steering
activation steering
0.312026
Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive activation steering · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract)
abstract
Refusals must be resilient, not brittle.” Yet guarding refusals against adversarial phrasing and shifting user contexts remains difficult: large language models (LLMs) still yield to jailbreak prompts that evade safety filters and surface harmful content. We propose Refusal Activation Steering (RAS), a training-free, inference-time method that uses contrastive activations to shift LLM responses, biasing generation trajectories toward refusals without altering model weights. The approach is modular and domain-targetable, avoiding collateral refusals on benign queries while strengthening activation- space boundaries for unsafe content. On adversarial evaluations with an 8B instruction-tuned model, we find that steering improves refusal rate by ∼ 52% and reduces attack success rate by ∼ 40%, establishing a lightweight and interpretable safety layer for robust refusal consistency. To foster further research in this domain, we have made our implementation publicly available.
Abhilekh Borah, Chebrolu Niranjan, Kokil Jaidka
AAAI2