Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chebrolu Niranjan
dblp:407/7013
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Language models and text generation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
jailbreak defense |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering › language model steering
activation steering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive activation steering · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Always Refuse: Steering LLMs Against Jailbreaks with Contrastive Activations (Student Abstract)abstractRefusals must be resilient, not brittle.” Yet guarding refusals against adversarial phrasing and shifting user contexts remains difficult: large language models (LLMs) still yield to jailbreak prompts that evade safety filters and surface harmful content. We propose Refusal Activation Steering (RAS), a training-free, inference-time method that uses contrastive activations to shift LLM responses, biasing generation trajectories toward refusals without altering model weights. The approach is modular and domain-targetable, avoiding collateral refusals on benign queries while strengthening activation- space boundaries for unsafe content. On adversarial evaluations with an 8B instruction-tuned model, we find that steering improves refusal rate by ∼ 52% and reduces attack success rate by ∼ 40%, establishing a lightweight and interpretable safety layer for robust refusal consistency. To foster further research in this domain, we have made our implementation publicly available. Abhilekh Borah, Chebrolu Niranjan, Kokil Jaidka |
AAAI | 2 |