Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sungje Park
dblp:407/7054
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
numerical integration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Integration Matters for Learning PDEs with Backward SDEs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning › physics-informed neural networks
partial differential equation solving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Integration Matters for Learning PDEs with Backward SDEs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Integration Matters for Learning PDEs with Backward SDEs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stratonovich integration · 1.7stochastic heun integration · 1.7euler-maruyama · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Integration Matters for Learning PDEs with Backward SDEsabstractBackward stochastic differential equation (BSDE)-based deep learning methods provide an alternative to Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for solving high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs), offering potential algorithmic advantages in settings such as stochastic optimal control, where the PDEs of interest are tied to an underlying dynamical system. However, standard BSDE-based solvers have empirically been shown to underperform relative to PINNs in the literature. In this paper, we identify the root cause of this performance gap as a discretization bias introduced by the standard Euler-Maruyama (EM) integration scheme applied to one-step self-consistency BSDE losses, which shifts the optimization landscape off target. We find that this bias cannot be satisfactorily addressed through finer step-sizes or multi-step self-consistency losses. To properly handle this issue, we propose a Stratonovich-based BSDE formulation, which we implement with stochastic Heun integration. We show that our proposed approach completely eliminates the bias issues faced by EM integration. Furthermore, our empirical results show that our Heun-based BSDE method consistently outperforms EM-based variants and achieves competitive results with PINNs across multiple high-dimensional benchmarks. Our findings highlight the critical role of integration schemes in BSDE-based PDE solvers, an algorithmic detail that has received little attention thus far in the literature. Sungje Park, Stephen Tu |
NeurIPS | 1 |