Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henglian Huang

dblp:407/8041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 77% Segmentation and scene understanding · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal evaluation
0.912025
Can Large Multimodal Models Understand Agricultural Scenes? Benchmarking with AgroMind · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding
0.312025
Can Large Multimodal Models Understand Agricultural Scenes? Benchmarking with AgroMind · NeurIPS 2025
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
agricultural remote sensing
0.312025
Can Large Multimodal Models Understand Agricultural Scenes? Benchmarking with AgroMind · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

question answering evaluation · 1.7benchmark construction · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Can Large Multimodal Models Understand Agricultural Scenes? Benchmarking with AgroMind
abstract
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has demonstrated capabilities across various domains, but comprehensive benchmarks for agricultural remote sensing (RS) remain scarce. Existing benchmarks designed for agricultural RS scenarios exhibit notable limitations, primarily in terms of insufficient scene diversity in the dataset and oversimplified task design. To bridge this gap, we introduce AgroMind, a comprehensive agricultural remote sensing benchmark covering four task dimensions: spatial perception, object understanding, scene understanding, and scene reasoning, with a total of 13 task types, ranging from crop identification and health monitoring to environmental analysis. We curate a high-quality evaluation set by integrating nine public datasets and one private global parcel dataset, containing 28,482 QA pairs and 20,850 images. The pipeline begins with multi-source data pre-processing, including collection, format standardization, and annotation refinement. We then generate a diverse set of agriculturally relevant questions through the systematic definition of tasks. Finally, we employ LMMs for inference, generating responses, and performing detailed examinations. We evaluated 20 open-source LMMs and 4 closed-source models on AgroMind. Experiments reveal significant performance gaps, particularly in spatial reasoning and fine-grained recognition, it is notable that human performance lags behind several leading LMMs. By establishing a standardized evaluation framework for agricultural RS, AgroMind reveals the limitations of LMMs in domain knowledge and highlights critical challenges for future work. Data and code can be accessed at https://rssysu.github.io/AgroMind/.
Qingmei Li, Zurong Mai, Shuohong Lou, Henglian Huang, Jiarui Zhang 0008, Yibin Wen, Haohuan Fu, Jianxi Huang, Juepeng Zheng
NeurIPS6