Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linda Fanconi

dblp:407/8107 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-0064-9085ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance › consent
informed consent
0.912025
Let's Get Visual - Testing Visual Analogies and Metaphors for Conveying Privacy Policies and Data Handling Information · SP 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy policy comprehension
0.912025
Let's Get Visual - Testing Visual Analogies and Metaphors for Conveying Privacy Policies and Data Handling Information · SP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

between-subjects study · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Personalization over Privacy? Implications of the Privacy-Personalization Trade-Off on Future Use of Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Adrienn Toth, Linda Fanconi, Noé Zufferey, Verena Zimmermann
AIED (6)2
2025 Let's Get Visual - Testing Visual Analogies and Metaphors for Conveying Privacy Policies and Data Handling Information
abstract
With EU-GDPR and related regulations, the respon-sibility to make privacy-related decisions such as to provide informed consent to data handling practices mainly rests with the user. However, current lengthy privacy policies and often deceptive cookie notices rarely facilitate truly informed consent. Related work on privacy icons or structuring privacy policies aims to enhance users' understanding but achieve mixed results. In a between-subjects study with N=379 participants we thus explored the potential of embedding privacy information in visual metaphors and analogies to support informed decision-making. Additionally, we explored whether dynamic feedback helped users understand the implications of their decisions. While both visual and textual information and feedback appeared to support users' understanding of data handling practices and alignment with personal preferences, with no significant differences between conditions, users per-ceived visualizations as more suitable and aesthetically pleasing than text. This indicates potential for using visual contexts to enhance informed consent not only within existing cookie notices but also in emerging tools such as privacy assistants or related privacy-enhancing technologies. Future work should investigate differences to currently deployed solutions and the effect of perceived pleasantness of design variants on users' understanding and decisions.
Verena Zimmermann, Adrienn Toth, Hannah Sievers, Linda Fanconi, Yanis Isenring, Mona Henz, Alina Stöver, Nina Gerber
SP4