Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Melody Zixuan Li

dblp:407/8113 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 56% Language models and text generation · 44%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.912025
Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
learned representation analysis
0.912025
Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
representation geometry
0.912025
Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.312025
Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training
0.312025
Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral analysis · 0.9eigenspectrum decay · 0.9effective rank · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training
abstract
Standard training metrics like loss fail to explain the emergence of complex capabilities in large language models. We take a spectral approach to investigate the geometry of learned representations across pretraining and post-training, measuring effective rank (RankMe) and eigenspectrum decay (αReQ). With OLMo (1B-7B) and Pythia (160M-12B) models, we uncover a consistent non-monotonic sequence of three geometric phases during autoregressive pretraining. The initial “warmup” phase exhibits rapid representational collapse. This is followed by an “entropy-seeking” phase, where the manifold’s dimensionality expands substantially, coinciding with peak n-gram memorization. Subsequently, a “compression-seeking” phase imposes anisotropic consolidation, selectively preserving variance along dominant eigendirections while contracting others, a transition marked with significant improvement in downstream task performance. We show these phases can emerge from a fundamental interplay of cross-entropy optimization under skewed token frequencies and representational bottlenecks (d ≪ |V|). Post-training further transforms geometry: SFT and DPO drive “entropy-seeking” dynamics to integrate specific instructional or preferential data, improving in-distribution performance while degrading out-of-distribution robustness. Conversely, RLVR induces “compression-seeking” , enhancing reward alignment but reducing generation diversity.
Melody Zixuan Li, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Arna Ghosh, Komal Kumar Teru, Adam Santoro, Guillaume Lajoie, Blake A. Richards
NeurIPS1