Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladimir Aletov

dblp:407/8378 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › byzantine robustness
byzantine attack defense
1.012026
Bant: Byzantine Antidote via Trial Function and Trust Scores · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › robust federated learning
byzantine-robust federated learning
1.012026
Bant: Byzantine Antidote via Trial Function and Trust Scores · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
1.012026
Bant: Byzantine Antidote via Trial Function and Trust Scores · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
Bant: Byzantine Antidote via Trial Function and Trust Scores · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trust scores · 1.0trial function · 1.0adam · 1.0RMSProp · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Bant: Byzantine Antidote via Trial Function and Trust Scores
abstract
Recent advancements in machine learning have improved performance while also increasing computational demands. While federated and distributed setups address these issues, their structures remain vulnerable to malicious influences. In this paper, we address a specific threat: Byzantine attacks, wherein compromised clients inject adversarial updates to derail global convergence. We combine the concept of trust scores with trial function methodology to dynamically filter outliers. Our methods address the critical limitations of previous approaches, allowing operation even when Byzantine nodes are in the majority. Moreover, our algorithms adapt to widely used scaled methods such as Adam and RMSProp, as well as practical scenarios, including local training and partial participation. We validate the robustness of our methods by conducting extensive experiments on both public datasets and private ECG data collected from medical institutions. Furthermore, we provide a broad theoretical analysis of our algorithms and their extensions to the aforementioned practical setups. The convergence guaranties of our methods are comparable to those of classical algorithms developed without Byzantine interference.
Gleb Molodtsov, Daniil Medyakov, Sergey Skorik, Nikolas Khachaturov, Shahane Tigranyan, Vladimir Aletov, Aram Avetisyan, Martin Takác 0001, Aleksandr Beznosikov
AAAI6