Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Phat Tieu
dblp:408/0654
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Free and Fair Hardware: A Pathway to Copyright Infringement-Free Verilog Generation using LLMs · DAC 2025 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
verilog generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Free and Fair Hardware: A Pathway to Copyright Infringement-Free Verilog Generation using LLMs · DAC 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9continual pre-training · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Free and Fair Hardware: A Pathway to Copyright Infringement-Free Verilog Generation using LLMsabstractLimitations in Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities for hardware design tasks, such as generating functional Verilog codes, have motivated various fine-tuning optimizations utilizing curated hardware datasets from open-source repositories. However, these datasets remain limited in size and contain minimal checks on licensing for reuse, resulting in potential copyright violations by fine-tuned LLMs. Therefore, we propose an evaluation benchmark to estimate the risk of Verilog-trained LLMs to generate copyright-protected codes. To minimize this risk, we present an open-source Verilog dataset, FreeSet, containing over 220k files, along with the automated dataset curation framework utilized to provide additional guarantees of fair-use Verilog data. We then execute an LLM fine-tuning framework consisting of continual pre-training, resulting in a fine-tuned Llama model for Verilog, FreeV. Our results indicate that FreeV demonstrates the smallest risk of copyright-infringement among prior works, with only a 3% violation rate. Furthermore, experimental results demonstrate improvements in Verilog generation functionality over its baseline model, improving VerilogEval pass@10 rates by over 10%. Sam Bush, Matthew DeLorenzo, Phat Tieu, Jeyavijayan Rajendran |
DAC | 3 |