Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youngwoo Shin
dblp:408/1524
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 46% Autonomous driving · 23% Vision and language · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Memorization or Reasoning? Exploring the Idiom Understanding of LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › pragmatics
idiom understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Memorization or Reasoning? Exploring the Idiom Understanding of LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
LiDAR perception |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | B4DL: A Benchmark for 4D LiDAR LLM in Spatio-Temporal Understanding · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | B4DL: A Benchmark for 4D LiDAR LLM in Spatio-Temporal Understanding · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal understanding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | B4DL: A Benchmark for 4D LiDAR LLM in Spatio-Temporal Understanding · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probing evaluation · 0.9multilingual dataset construction · 0.9large language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Development and Evaluation of a Dual-Expertise, Utterance-Level Framework for LLM-Based Science Classroom Discourse AnalysisabstractThis study proposes a novel coding framework for analyzing science classroom discourse using large language models (LLMs), adopting fine-grained utterance-level chunking aligned with the analytical units of LLMs to address limitations of global, lesson-level observation tools. Authentic middle school science classroom discourse was annotated through a dual-expertise and iterative process integrating the theoretical knowledge of science education faculty with the experiential insights of in-service teachers, supported by systematic rater training to ensure conceptual alignment and interpretive consistency at the utterance level. Through this process, a science education glossary comprising 137 instructional terms organized into 20 thematic categories was developed using a primarily bottom-up approach informed by established observation frameworks. Building on this theory-informed foundation, we systematically examined LLM-based methods for predicting instructional themes and quality, comparing structured prompting strategies with domain-adaptive fine-tuning across model architectures. These contributions lay a foundation for future research on interpretable, scalable, and pedagogically meaningful automated formative feedback to support teachers’ self-reflection and professional growth. Jin Eun Yoo, Nam-Hwa Kang, Suna Ryu, Jun-ki Lee, Youngsun Kwak, Taeuk Kim, Hyeong Gwan Kim, Youngwoo Shin, Uiji Hwang |
LAK | 8 |
| 2025 | Memorization or Reasoning? Exploring the Idiom Understanding of LLMsabstractIdioms have long posed a challenge due to their unique linguistic properties, which set them apart from other common expressions.While recent studies have leveraged large language models (LLMs) to handle idioms across various tasks, e.g., idiom-containing sentence generation and idiomatic machine translation, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of idiom processing in LLMs, particularly in multilingual settings.To this end, we introduce MI-DAS, a new large-scale dataset of idioms in six languages, each paired with its corresponding meaning.Leveraging this resource, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' idiom processing ability, identifying key factors that influence their performance.Our findings suggest that LLMs rely not only on memorization but also adopt a hybrid approach that integrates contextual cues and reasoning, especially when processing compositional idioms.This implies that idiom understanding in LLMs emerges from an interplay between internal knowledge retrieval and reasoning-based inference. Youngwoo Shin, Uiji Hwang, Richeng Xuan, Taeuk Kim |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | B4DL: A Benchmark for 4D LiDAR LLM in Spatio-Temporal Understanding
Changho Choi, Youngwoo Shin, Gyojin Han, Junmo Kim 0002 |
ACM Multimedia | 2 |