EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ah Yeon Kim
dblp:408/1924
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 56% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught Reasoners · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-improvement |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught Reasoners · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught Reasoners · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rejection sampling fine-tuning · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9adaptive sampling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught ReasonersabstractSelf-Taught Reasoners (STaR), synonymously known as Rejection sampling Fine-Tuning (RFT), is an integral part of the training pipeline of self-improving reasoning Language Models (LMs).
The self-improving mechanism often employs random observation (data) sampling.
However, this results in trained observation imbalance; inefficiently over-training on solved examples while under-training on challenging ones.
In response, we introduce Adaptive STaR (AdaSTaR), a novel algorithm that rectifies this by integrating two adaptive sampling principles: (1) Adaptive Sampling for Diversity: promoting balanced training across observations, and (2) Adaptive Sampling for Curriculum: dynamically adjusting data difficulty to match the model's evolving strength. Across six benchmarks, AdaSTaR achieves best test accuracy in all instances (6/6) and reduces training FLOPs by an average of 58.6\% against an extensive list of baselines. These improvements in performance and efficiency generalize to different pre-trained LMs and larger models, paving the way for more efficient and effective self-improving LMs. Reiss Koh, Wonbeen Oh, Jaein Jang, Minhyung Lee, Ah Yeon Kim, Joonkee Kim, Taehyeon Kim 0001, Se-Young Yun |
NeurIPS | 6 |