Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pawan Neupane

dblp:408/9051 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein complex structure prediction
0.912025
PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.912025
PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph transformer
0.312025
PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph transformer · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models
abstract
Predicting protein complex structures is essential for protein function analysis, protein design, and drug discovery. While AI methods like AlphaFold can predict accurate structural models for many protein complexes, reliably estimating the quality of these predicted models (estimation of model accuracy, or EMA) for model ranking and selection remains a major challenge. A key barrier to developing effective machine learning-based EMA methods is the lack of large, diverse, and well-annotated datasets for training and evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce PSBench, a benchmark suite comprising five large-scale, labeled datasets, four of which were generated during the 15th and 16th community-wide Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP15 and CASP16), and one curated for new Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries deposited between July 2024 and August 2025. PSBench includes over 1.4 million structural models covering a wide range of protein sequence lengths, complex stoichiometries, functional classes, and modeling difficulties. Each model is annotated with multiple complementary quality scores at the global, local, and interface levels. PSBench also provides multiple evaluation metrics and baseline EMA methods to facilitate rigorous comparisons. To demonstrate PSBench’s utility, we trained and evaluated GATE, a graph transformer-based EMA method, on the CASP15 data. GATE was blindly tested in CASP16 (2024), where it ranked among the top-performing EMA methods. These results highlight PSBench as a valuable resource for advancing EMA research in protein complex modeling. PSBench is publicly available at: https://github.com/BioinfoMachineLearning/PSBench.
Pawan Neupane, Jianlin Cheng
NeurIPS1