Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pawan Neupane
dblp:408/9051
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein complex structure prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph transformer |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph transformer · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PSBench: a large-scale benchmark for estimating the accuracy of protein complex structural modelsabstractPredicting protein complex structures is essential for protein function analysis, protein design, and drug discovery. While AI methods like AlphaFold can predict accurate structural models for many protein complexes, reliably estimating the quality of these predicted models (estimation of model accuracy, or EMA) for model ranking and selection remains a major challenge. A key barrier to developing effective machine learning-based EMA methods is the lack of large, diverse, and well-annotated datasets for training and evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce PSBench, a benchmark suite comprising five large-scale, labeled datasets, four of which were generated during the 15th and 16th community-wide Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP15 and CASP16), and one curated for new Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries deposited between July 2024 and August 2025. PSBench includes over 1.4 million structural models covering a wide range of protein sequence lengths, complex stoichiometries, functional classes, and modeling difficulties. Each model is annotated with multiple complementary quality scores at the global, local, and interface levels. PSBench also provides multiple evaluation metrics and baseline EMA methods to facilitate rigorous comparisons. To demonstrate PSBench’s utility, we trained and evaluated GATE, a graph transformer-based EMA method, on the CASP15 data. GATE was blindly tested in CASP16 (2024), where it ranked among the top-performing EMA methods. These results highlight PSBench as a valuable resource for advancing EMA research in protein complex modeling. PSBench is publicly available at: https://github.com/BioinfoMachineLearning/PSBench. Pawan Neupane, Jianlin Cheng |
NeurIPS | 1 |