Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fugen Hagihara

dblp:408/9573 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0928-7297ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Coding theory · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › sequences
linear recurrence sequences
0.912025
The Ultimate Signs of Second-Order Holonomic Sequences · ICALP 2025
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Ultimate Signs of Second-Order Holonomic Sequences
abstract
A real-valued sequence f = {f(n)}_{n ∈ ℕ} is said to be second-order holonomic if it satisfies a linear recurrence f (n + 2) = P (n) f (n + 1) + Q (n) f (n) for all sufficiently large n, where P, Q ∈ ℝ(x) are rational functions. We study the ultimate sign of such a sequence, i.e., the repeated pattern that the signs of f (n) follow for sufficiently large n. For each P, Q we determine all ultimate signs that f can have, and show how they partition the space of initial values of f. This completes the prior work by Neumann, Ouaknine and Worrell, who have settled some restricted cases. As a corollary, it follows that when P, Q have rational coefficients, f either has an ultimate sign of length 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 or 12, or never falls into a repeated sign pattern. We also give a partial algorithm that finds the ultimate sign of f (or tells that there is none) in almost all cases.
Fugen Hagihara, Akitoshi Kawamura
ICALP1