Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fugen Hagihara
dblp:408/9573
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0928-7297ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Coding theory · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › sequences
linear recurrence sequences |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Ultimate Signs of Second-Order Holonomic Sequences · ICALP 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Ultimate Signs of Second-Order Holonomic SequencesabstractA real-valued sequence f = {f(n)}_{n ∈ ℕ} is said to be second-order holonomic if it satisfies a linear recurrence f (n + 2) = P (n) f (n + 1) + Q (n) f (n) for all sufficiently large n, where P, Q ∈ ℝ(x) are rational functions. We study the ultimate sign of such a sequence, i.e., the repeated pattern that the signs of f (n) follow for sufficiently large n. For each P, Q we determine all ultimate signs that f can have, and show how they partition the space of initial values of f. This completes the prior work by Neumann, Ouaknine and Worrell, who have settled some restricted cases. As a corollary, it follows that when P, Q have rational coefficients, f either has an ultimate sign of length 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 or 12, or never falls into a repeated sign pattern. We also give a partial algorithm that finds the ultimate sign of f (or tells that there is none) in almost all cases. Fugen Hagihara, Akitoshi Kawamura |
ICALP | 1 |