Johannes Bordne

dblp:409/1405 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Graph learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty
0.912025
Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterophily
0.912025
Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information theory · 0.9density estimation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory
abstract
While uncertainty estimation for graphs recently gained traction, most methods rely on homophily and deteriorate in heterophilic settings. We address this by analyzing message passing neural networks from an information-theoretic perspective and developing a suitable analog to data processing inequality to quantify information throughout the model’s layers. In contrast to non-graph domains, information about the node-level prediction target can increase with model depth if a node’s features are semantically different from its neighbors. Therefore, on heterophilic graphs, the latent embeddings of an MPNN each provide different information about the data distribution - different from homophilic settings. This reveals that considering all node representations simultaneously is a key design principle for epistemic uncertainty estimation on graphs beyond homophily. We empirically confirm this with a simple post-hoc density estimator on the joint node embedding space that provides state-of-the-art uncertainty on heterophilic graphs. At the same time, it matches prior work on homophilic graphs without explicitly exploiting homophily through post-processing.
Dominik Fuchsgruber, Tom Wollschläger, Johannes Bordne, Stephan Günnemann
ICML3