EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johannes Bordne
dblp:409/1405
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Graph learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterophily |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information theory · 0.9density estimation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Uncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information TheoryabstractWhile uncertainty estimation for graphs recently gained traction, most methods rely on homophily and deteriorate in heterophilic settings. We address this by analyzing message passing neural networks from an information-theoretic perspective and developing a suitable analog to data processing inequality to quantify information throughout the model’s layers. In contrast to non-graph domains, information about the node-level prediction target can increase with model depth if a node’s features are semantically different from its neighbors. Therefore, on heterophilic graphs, the latent embeddings of an MPNN each provide different information about the data distribution - different from homophilic settings. This reveals that considering all node representations simultaneously is a key design principle for epistemic uncertainty estimation on graphs beyond homophily. We empirically confirm this with a simple post-hoc density estimator on the joint node embedding space that provides state-of-the-art uncertainty on heterophilic graphs. At the same time, it matches prior work on homophilic graphs without explicitly exploiting homophily through post-processing. Dominik Fuchsgruber, Tom Wollschläger, Johannes Bordne, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 3 |