Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amin Jalilov

dblp:409/1774 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-3244-7637ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Biometric security · 54% Systems and software security · 46%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Immersive interaction · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security › biometric authentication
behavioral biometric authentication
1.012026
Leveraging Biometric-Rich Hand Gestures for Head-Mounted Display Authentication · CHI 2026
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery › fuzzing
differential fuzzing
0.912025
Fork State-Aware Differential Fuzzing for Blockchain Consensus Implementations · ICSE 2025
Software testing › fuzzing
differential fuzzing
0.912025
Fork State-Aware Differential Fuzzing for Blockchain Consensus Implementations · ICSE 2025
Software testing
fuzzing
0.912025
Fork State-Aware Differential Fuzzing for Blockchain Consensus Implementations · ICSE 2025
Immersive interaction › head-mounted display
head-mounted display interaction
0.312026
Leveraging Biometric-Rich Hand Gestures for Head-Mounted Display Authentication · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 2.0anomaly detection · 2.0fork-diversifying feedback · 1.7fork-aware mutation · 1.7differential fuzzing · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Leveraging Biometric-Rich Hand Gestures for Head-Mounted Display Authentication
abstract
User authentication on head-mounted displays (HMDs) relies on passwords, which are cumbersome to input and susceptible to shoulder-surfing attacks. Recent research has revealed that behavioral signals collected during common HMD tasks are highly distinctive between users. Building on these findings, this paper presents a knowledge-driven behavioral authentication system for HMDs. Our system leverages user-defined gestures as cues and trains an anomaly detector on hand joint motion signals for each user. To evaluate effectiveness, we conducted a comprehensive multi-session user study (n = 20) and an observation attack study (n = 10). The results show that gestures secured with joint motions are resilient to worst-case scenario video-based observation attacks (AUC = 0.97, EER = 3.58%) and maintain high recall performance over one week (AUC = 0.93, EER = 9.82%). These findings suggest that user-generated biometric hand gestures offer a promising approach to securing HMDs.
Amin Jalilov, Eunyong Cheon, Ian Oakley
CHI1
2025 Fork State-Aware Differential Fuzzing for Blockchain Consensus Implementations
abstract
Blockchain networks allow multiple client implementations of the same consensus algorithm by different developers to coexist in the same system. Ensuring correct implementations among these heterogeneous clients is crucial, as even slight semantic discrepancies in their implementations can lead to safety failures. While existing fuzzing frameworks have discovered implementation flaws in blockchain, they suffer from several challenges in testing them with sequences of conflicting blocks, called forks. Existing tools fail to adequately assess the forkhandling processes in blockchain implementations when relying on traditional code coverage feedback, which lacks the granularity needed to navigate the diverse and complex fork-handling scenarios. This paper introduces FORKY, a fork state-aware differential fuzzing framework designed to detect implementation discrepancies within the critical fork-handling process with its novel fork-aware mutation and fork-diversifying feedback mechanisms. We test FORKY on the two most influential blockchain projects: Bitcoin and Ethereum, which are the representatives of the two major blockchain consensus algorithm families, Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus algorithms.
Wonhoi Kim, Hocheol Nam 0001, Muoi Tran, Amin Jalilov, Zhenkai Liang, Sang Kil Cha, Min Suk Kang
ICSE4