EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinjian Liu
dblp:409/2450
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 44% Program synthesis and code generation · 44% Compilers and program optimization · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
large-scale retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DS SERVE: A Framework for Efficient and Scalable Neural Retrieval · AAAI 2026 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DS SERVE: A Framework for Efficient and Scalable Neural Retrieval · AAAI 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DS SERVE: A Framework for Efficient and Scalable Neural Retrieval · AAAI 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Software testing
performance testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | DS SERVE: A Framework for Efficient and Scalable Neural Retrieval · AAAI 2026 |
Compilers and program optimization
software optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural retrieval · 1.0inference-time tradeoff · 1.0large language model · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DS SERVE: A Framework for Efficient and Scalable Neural RetrievalabstractWe present DS SERVE, a framework that transforms large-scale text datasets—comprising half a trillion tokens—into a high-performance neural retrieval system. DS SERVE offers both a web interface and API endpoints, achieving low latency with modest memory overhead on a single node. The framework also supports inference-time tradeoffs between latency, accuracy, and result diversity. We anticipate that DS SERVE will be broadly useful for a range of applications such as large-scale retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), training data attribution, training a search agent, and beyond. Jinjian Liu, Xinxi Lyu, Rulin Shao, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Matei Zaharia, Sewon Min |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-AgentsabstractDeveloping high-performance software is a complex task that requires specialized expertise. We introduce GSO, a benchmark for evaluating language models' capabilities in developing high-performance software.We develop an automated pipeline that generates and executes performance tests to analyze repository commit histories to identify 102 challenging optimization tasks across 10 codebases, spanning diverse domains and programming languages.An agent is provided with a codebase and performance test as a precise specification, and tasked to improve the runtime efficiency, which is measured against the expert developer optimization.Our quantitative evaluation reveals that leading SWE-Agents struggle significantly, achieving less than 5% success rate, with limited improvements even with inference-time scaling.Our qualitative analysis identifies key failure modes, including difficulties with low-level languages, practicing lazy optimization strategies, and challenges in accurately localizing bottlenecks.We release the code and artifacts of our benchmark along with agent trajectories to enable future research. Manish Shetty, Naman Jain, Jinjian Liu, Vijay Kethanaboyina, Koushik Sen, Ion Stoica |
NeurIPS | 3 |