Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Dombos
dblp:409/7102
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR · NeurIPS 2025 |
Image and video processing
image reconstruction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR · NeurIPS 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational objective · 1.7time-dependent calibration · 1.7deterministic trajectory adjustment · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIRabstractFlow-based latent generative models such as Stable Diffusion 3 are able to generate images with remarkable quality, even enabling photorealistic text-to-image generation. Their impressive performance suggests that these models should also constitute powerful priors for inverse imaging problems, but that approach has not yet led to comparable fidelity.
There are several key obstacles: (i) the data likelihood term is usually intractable; (ii) learned generative models cannot be directly conditioned on the distorted observations, leading to conflicting objectives between data likelihood and prior; and (iii) the reconstructions can deviate from the observed data.
We present FLAIR, a novel, training-free variational framework that leverages flow-based generative models as prior for inverse problems. To that end, we introduce a variational objective for flow matching that is agnostic to the type of degradation, and combine it with deterministic trajectory adjustments to guide the prior towards regions which are more likely under the posterior.
To enforce exact consistency with the observed data, we decouple the optimization of the data fidelity and regularization terms. Moreover, we introduce a time-dependent calibration scheme in which the strength of the regularization is modulated according to off-line accuracy estimates.
Results on standard imaging benchmarks demonstrate that FLAIR consistently outperforms existing diffusion- and flow-based methods in terms of reconstruction quality and sample diversity.
Source code is available at https://inverseflair.github.io/. Julius Erbach, Dominik Narnhofer, Andreas Dombos, Bernt Schiele, Jan Eric Lenssen, Konrad Schindler |
NeurIPS | 3 |