Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Boheng Sheng

dblp:409/7154 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
long-context question answering
0.912025
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
passage selection
0.912025
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization › long-context modeling
long-context understanding
0.312025
Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic similarity · 1.7question-aware classifier · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Dynamic Chunking and Selection for Reading Comprehension of Ultra-Long Context in Large Language Models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle to accurately read and comprehend extremely long texts.Current methods for improvement typically rely on splitting long contexts into fixed-length chunks.However, fixed truncation risks separating semantically relevant content, leading to ambiguity and compromising accurate understanding.To overcome this limitation, we propose a straightforward approach for dynamically separating and selecting chunks of long context, facilitating a more streamlined input for LLMs.In particular, we compute semantic similarities between adjacent sentences, using lower similarities to adaptively divide long contexts into variable-length chunks.We further train a question-aware classifier to select sensitive chunks that are critical for answering specific questions.Experimental results on both singlehop and multi-hop question-answering benchmarks show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms strong baselines.Notably, it maintains robustness across a wide range of input lengths, handling sequences of up to 256k tokens.Our datasets and
Boheng Sheng, Jiacheng Yao, Meicong Zhang, Guoxiu He
ACL (1)1