Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yongqi Han 0005
dblp:409/7698
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Time series and sequential data · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
model calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-collective Calibrating Strategy for Time Series Forecasting · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-collective Calibrating Strategy for Time Series Forecasting · IJCAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
model refinement |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Non-collective Calibrating Strategy for Time Series Forecasting · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-target learning · 0.9early stopping · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Non-collective Calibrating Strategy for Time Series ForecastingabstractDeep learning-based approaches have demonstrated significant advancements in time series forecasting. Despite these ongoing developments, the complex dynamics of time series make it challenging to establish the rule of thumb for designing the golden model architecture. In this study, we argue that refining existing advanced models through a universal calibrating strategy can deliver substantial benefits with minimal resource costs, as opposed to elaborating and training a new model from scratch. We first identify a multi-target learning conflict in the calibrating process, which arises when optimizing variables across time steps, leading to the underutilization of the model's learning capabilities. To address this issue, we propose an innovative calibrating strategy called Socket+Plug (SoP). This approach retains an exclusive optimizer and early-stopping monitor for each predicted target within each Plug while keeping the fully trained Socket backbone frozen. The model-agnostic nature of SoP allows it to directly calibrate the performance of any trained deep forecasting models, regardless of their specific architectures. Extensive experiments on various time series benchmarks and a spatio-temporal meteorological ERA5 dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of SoP, achieving up to a 22% improvement even when employing a simple MLP as the Plug (highlighted in Figure 1). Bin Wang 0045, Yongqi Han 0005, Minbo Ma, Tianrui Li 0001, Junbo Zhang 0004, Feng Hong 0001, Yanwei Yu |
IJCAI | 2 |