EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shashwat Naidu
dblp:409/8769
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-9315-5705ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 91% Generative modeling · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning › numerical reasoning
financial numerical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Program of Thoughts for Financial Reasoning: Leveraging Dynamic In-Context Examples and Generative Retrieval · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Program of Thoughts for Financial Reasoning: Leveraging Dynamic In-Context Examples and Generative Retrieval · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Program of Thoughts for Financial Reasoning: Leveraging Dynamic In-Context Examples and Generative Retrieval · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
program-of-thought prompting · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9generative retrieval · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Program of Thoughts for Financial Reasoning: Leveraging Dynamic In-Context Examples and Generative RetrievalabstractDespite continuous advancements in the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), numerical reasoning remains a challenging area.Techniques like chain-of-thought prompting, tree-of-thought prompting, and program-ofthought prompting guide LLMs through intermediate reasoning steps.Although in-context learning with few-shot prompting has improved performance, LLMs still lag behind state-ofthe-art models on financial numerical reasoning datasets such as FinQA and ConvFinQA.In this work, we introduce FINDER, a novel twostep framework, to enhance LLM's capabilities in financial numerical reasoning.The first step utilizes a generative retriever to extract relevant facts from unstructured data, including both text and tables.This is followed by contextaware Program of Thought prompting with dynamic selection of in-context examples.Our model FINDER achieves a new state-of-theart performance on both the FinQA and Con-vFinQA datasets, surpassing previous benchmarks with execution accuracy improvements of 5.98% and 4.05%, respectively. Subhendu Khatuya, Shashwat Naidu, Pawan Goyal 0002, Niloy Ganguly |
EMNLP | 2 |