EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arman Hatami
dblp:409/8889
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
LLM unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy and data protection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
primal-dual optimization · 0.9logit-margin flattening loss · 0.9constrained optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language ModelsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) deployed in real-world settings increasingly face the need to unlearn sensitive, outdated, or proprietary information. Existing unlearning methods typically formulate forgetting and retention as a regularized trade-off, combining both objectives into a single scalarized loss. This often leads to unstable optimization and degraded performance on retained data, especially under aggressive forgetting. We propose a new formulation of LLM unlearning as a constrained optimization problem: forgetting is enforced via a novel logit-margin flattening loss that explicitly drives the output distribution toward uniformity on a designated forget set, while retention is preserved through a hard constraint on a separate retain set. Compared to entropy-based objectives, our loss is softmax-free, numerically stable, and maintains non-vanishing gradients, enabling more efficient and robust optimization.
We solve the constrained problem using a scalable primal-dual algorithm that exposes the trade-off between forgetting and retention through the dynamics of the dual variable, all without any extra computational overhead.
Evaluations on the TOFU and MUSE benchmarks across diverse LLM architectures demonstrate that our approach consistently matches or exceeds state-of-the-art baselines, effectively removing targeted information while preserving downstream utility. Taha Entesari, Arman Hatami, Rinat Khaziev, Anil Ramakrishna, Mahyar Fazlyab |
NeurIPS | 2 |