Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matei Gabriel Cosa

dblp:409/9004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
bandit feedback
0.912025
Learning-Augmented Algorithms for MTS with Bandit Access to Multiple Predictors · ICML 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
learning-augmented algorithms
0.912025
Learning-Augmented Algorithms for MTS with Bandit Access to Multiple Predictors · ICML 2025
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
metrical task systems
0.912025
Learning-Augmented Algorithms for MTS with Bandit Access to Multiple Predictors · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online algorithms · 0.9bandit learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning-Augmented Algorithms for MTS with Bandit Access to Multiple Predictors
abstract
Combining algorithms is one of the key techniques in learning-augmented algorithms. We consider the following problem: We are given $\ell$ heuristics for Metrical Task Systems (MTS), where each might be tailored to a different type of input instances. While processing an input instance received online, we are allowed to query the action of only one of the heuristics at each time step. Our goal is to achieve performance comparable to the best of the given heuristics. The main difficulty of our setting comes from the fact that the cost paid by a heuristic at time $t$ cannot be estimated unless the same heuristic was also queried at time $t-1$. This is related to Bandit Learning against memory bounded adversaries (Arora et al., 2012). We show how to achieve regret of $O(\text{OPT}^{2/3})$ and prove a tight lower bound based on the construction of Dekel et al. (2013).
Matei Gabriel Cosa, Marek Eliás 0001
ICML1