Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott le Roux
dblp:409/9106
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Measuring Long-Range Interactions in Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
long-range interaction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Measuring Long-Range Interactions in Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic experiments · 1.7range measure · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On Measuring Long-Range Interactions in Graph Neural NetworksabstractLong-range graph tasks — those dependent on interactions between ‘distant’ nodes — are an open problem in graph neural network research. Real-world benchmark tasks, especially the Long Range Graph Benchmark, have become popular for validating the long-range capability of proposed architectures. However, this is an empirical approach that lacks both robustness and theoretical underpinning; a more principled characterization of the long-range problem is required. To bridge this gap, we formalize long-range interactions in graph tasks, introduce a range measure for operators on graphs, and validate it with synthetic experiments. We then leverage our measure to examine commonly used tasks and architectures, and discuss to what extent they are, in fact, long-range. We believe our work advances efforts to define and address the long-range problem on graphs, and that our range measure will aid evaluation of new datasets and architectures. Jacob Bamberger, Benjamin Gutteridge, Scott le Roux, Michael M. Bronstein, Xiaowen Dong 0001 |
ICML | 3 |