Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stuart J. Newfeld
dblp:41/10530
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Automated annotation of developmental stages of Drosophila embryos in images containing spatial patterns of expression · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | FlyExpress: visual mining of spatiotemporal patterns for genes and publications in Drosophila embryogenesis · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression pattern analysis
spatial gene expression pattern analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Automated annotation of developmental stages of Drosophila embryos in images containing spatial patterns of expression · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning classification · 0.2image annotation mining · 0.1heatmap visualization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Automated annotation of developmental stages of Drosophila embryos in images containing spatial patterns of expressionabstractMOTIVATION: Drosophila melanogaster is a major model organism for investigating the function and interconnection of animal genes in the earliest stages of embryogenesis. Today, images capturing Drosophila gene expression patterns are being produced at a higher throughput than ever before. The analysis of spatial patterns of gene expression is most biologically meaningful when images from a similar time point during development are compared. Thus, the critical first step is to determine the developmental stage of an embryo. This information is also needed to observe and analyze expression changes over developmental time. Currently, developmental stages (time) of embryos in images capturing spatial expression pattern are annotated manually, which is time- and labor-intensive. Embryos are often designated into stage ranges, making the information on developmental time course. This makes downstream analyses inefficient and biological interpretations of similarities and differences in spatial expression patterns challenging, particularly when using automated tools for analyzing expression patterns of large number of images. RESULTS: Here, we present a new computational approach to annotate developmental stage for Drosophila embryos in the gene expression images. In an analysis of 3724 images, the new approach shows high accuracy in predicting the developmental stage correctly (79%). In addition, it provides a stage score that enables one to more finely annotate each embryo so that they are divided into early and late periods of development within standard stage demarcations. Stage scores for all images containing expression patterns of the same gene enable a direct way to view expression changes over developmental time for any gene. We show that the genomewide-expression-maps generated using images from embryos in refined stages illuminate global gene activities and changes much better, and more refined stage annotations improve our ability to better interpret results when expression pattern matches are discovered between genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software package is availablefor download at: http://www.public.asu.edu/*jye02/Software/Fly-Project/. Lei Yuan 0001, Shuiwang Ji, Michael McCutchan, Zhi-Hua Zhou, Stuart J. Newfeld, Sudhir Kumar 0001, Jieping Ye |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2013 | Image-level and group-level models for Drosophila gene expression pattern annotationabstractBACKGROUND: Drosophila melanogaster has been established as a model organism for investigating the developmental gene interactions. The spatio-temporal gene expression patterns of Drosophila melanogaster can be visualized by in situ hybridization and documented as digital images. Automated and efficient tools for analyzing these expression images will provide biological insights into the gene functions, interactions, and networks. To facilitate pattern recognition and comparison, many web-based resources have been created to conduct comparative analysis based on the body part keywords and the associated images. With the fast accumulation of images from high-throughput techniques, manual inspection of images will impose a serious impediment on the pace of biological discovery. It is thus imperative to design an automated system for efficient image annotation and comparison. RESULTS: We present a computational framework to perform anatomical keywords annotation for Drosophila gene expression images. The spatial sparse coding approach is used to represent local patches of images in comparison with the well-known bag-of-words (BoW) method. Three pooling functions including max pooling, average pooling and Sqrt (square root of mean squared statistics) pooling are employed to transform the sparse codes to image features. Based on the constructed features, we develop both an image-level scheme and a group-level scheme to tackle the key challenges in annotating Drosophila gene expression pattern images automatically. To deal with the imbalanced data distribution inherent in image annotation tasks, the undersampling method is applied together with majority vote. Results on Drosophila embryonic expression pattern images verify the efficacy of our approach. CONCLUSION: In our experiment, the three pooling functions perform comparably well in feature dimension reduction. The undersampling with majority vote is shown to be effective in tackling the problem of imbalanced data. Moreover, combining sparse coding and image-level scheme leads to consistent performance improvement in keywords annotation. Qian Sun 0002, Sherin Muckatira, Lei Yuan 0001, Shuiwang Ji, Stuart J. Newfeld, Sudhir Kumar 0001, Jieping Ye |
BMC Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2013 | A mesh generation and machine learning framework for Drosophila gene expression pattern image analysisabstractBACKGROUND: Multicellular organisms consist of cells of many different types that are established during development. Each type of cell is characterized by the unique combination of expressed gene products as a result of spatiotemporal gene regulation. Currently, a fundamental challenge in regulatory biology is to elucidate the gene expression controls that generate the complex body plans during development. Recent advances in high-throughput biotechnologies have generated spatiotemporal expression patterns for thousands of genes in the model organism fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Existing qualitative methods enhanced by a quantitative analysis based on computational tools we present in this paper would provide promising ways for addressing key scientific questions. RESULTS: We develop a set of computational methods and open source tools for identifying co-expressed embryonic domains and the associated genes simultaneously. To map the expression patterns of many genes into the same coordinate space and account for the embryonic shape variations, we develop a mesh generation method to deform a meshed generic ellipse to each individual embryo. We then develop a co-clustering formulation to cluster the genes and the mesh elements, thereby identifying co-expressed embryonic domains and the associated genes simultaneously. Experimental results indicate that the gene and mesh co-clusters can be correlated to key developmental events during the stages of embryogenesis we study. The open source software tool has been made available at http://compbio.cs.odu.edu/fly/. CONCLUSIONS: Our mesh generation and machine learning methods and tools improve upon the flexibility, ease-of-use and accuracy of existing methods. Wenlu Zhang, Daming Feng, Rongjian Li, Andrey N. Chernikov, Nikos Chrisochoides, Christopher Osgood, Charlotte Konikoff, Stuart J. Newfeld, Sudhir Kumar 0001, Shuiwang Ji |
BMC Bioinform. | 8 |
| 2011 | FlyExpress: visual mining of spatiotemporal patterns for genes and publications in Drosophila embryogenesisabstractSUMMARY: Images containing spatial expression patterns illuminate the roles of different genes during embryogenesis. In order to generate initial clues to regulatory interactions, biologists frequently need to know the set of genes expressed at the same time at specific locations in a developing embryo, as well as related research publications. However, text-based mining of image annotations and research articles cannot produce all relevant results, because the primary data are images that exist as graphical objects. We have developed a unique knowledge base (FlyExpress) to facilitate visual mining of images from Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis. By clicking on specific locations in pictures of fly embryos from different stages of development and different visual projections, users can produce a list of genes and publications instantly. In FlyExpress, each queryable embryo picture is a heat-map that captures the expression patterns of more than 4500 genes and more than 2600 published articles. In addition, one can view spatial patterns for particular genes over time as well as find other genes with similar expression patterns at a given developmental stage. Therefore, FlyExpress is a unique tool for mining spatiotemporal expression patterns in a format readily accessible to the scientific community. AVAILABILITY: http://www.flyexpress.net CONTACT: [email protected]. Sudhir Kumar 0001, Charlotte Konikoff, Bernard Van Emden, Christopher Busick, Kailah T. Davis, Shuiwang Ji, Lin-Wei Wu, Hector Ramos, Thomas Brody, Sethuraman Panchanathan, Jieping Ye, Timothy L. Karr, Kristyn Gerold, Michael McCutchan, Stuart J. Newfeld |
Bioinform. | 15 |