Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex K. Susemihl

dblp:41/11107 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 34% Reinforcement learning · 34% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian filtering
0.112011
Analytical Results for the Error in Filtering of Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural coding
0.112011
Analytical Results for the Error in Filtering of Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
sensory processing
0.112011
Analytical Results for the Error in Filtering of Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.112014
Optimal Neural Codes for Control and Estimation · NIPS 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian decoding · 0.2neural coding · 0.2control theory · 0.2mean-squared error analysis · 0.1mean squared error analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Optimal Neural Codes for Control and Estimation
Alex K. Susemihl, Ron Meir, Manfred Opper
NIPS1
2011 Analytical Results for the Error in Filtering of Gaussian Processes
abstract
Bayesian filtering of stochastic stimuli has received a great deal of attention re- cently. It has been applied to describe the way in which biological systems dy- namically represent and make decisions about the environment. There have been no exact results for the error in the biologically plausible setting of inference on point process, however. We present an exact analysis of the evolution of the mean- squared error in a state estimation task using Gaussian-tuned point processes as sensors. This allows us to study the dynamics of the error of an optimal Bayesian decoder, providing insights into the limits obtainable in this task. This is done for Markovian and a class of non-Markovian Gaussian processes. We find that there is an optimal tuning width for which the error is minimized. This leads to a char- acterization of the optimal encoding for the setting as a function of the statistics of the stimulus, providing a mathematically sound primer for an ecological theory of sensory processing.
Alex K. Susemihl, Ron Meir, Manfred Opper
NIPS1