Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicholas Seow

dblp:41/1336 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Program analysis · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › reverse engineering
design recovery
0.012003
DRT: A Tool for Design Recovery of Interactive Graphical Applications · ICSE 2003
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › trace analysis
execution trace analysis
0.012003
DRT: A Tool for Design Recovery of Interactive Graphical Applications · ICSE 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

execution burst analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 DRT: A Tool for Design Recovery of Interactive Graphical Applications
abstract
Nowadays, the majority of productivity applications are interactive and graphical in nature. In this demonstration, we explore the possibility of taking advantage of these two characteristics in a design recovery tool. Specifically, the fact that an application is interactive means that we can identify distinct execution bursts corresponding closely to "actions" performed by the user. The fact that the application is graphical means that we can describe those actions visually from a fragment of the application display itself. Combining these two ideas, we obtain an explicit mapping from high-level actions performed by a user (similar to use case scenarios/specification fragments) to their low-level implementation. This mapping can be used for design recovery of interactive graphical applications. We demonstrate our approach using L/sub Y/X, a scientific word processor.
Keith Chan, Annie Chen, Zhi Cong Leo Liang, Amir Michail, Minh Hoai, Nicholas Seow
ICSE6