Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Will Bridewell

dblp:41/2414 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
23ranked-venue papers
11as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3676-9279ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 9 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 65% Robot navigation and mapping · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 7%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 97% User interface design and tools · 3%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › nonverbal communication
robot gaze behavior
0.612022
A Novel Architectural Method for Producing Dynamic Gaze Behavior in Human-Robot Interactions · HRI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
constraint discovery
0.112012
Discovering Constraints for Inductive Process Modeling · AAAI 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
model search
0.112012
Discovering Constraints for Inductive Process Modeling · AAAI 2012
Computational science and engineering › spatial statistics
spatiotemporal modeling
0.112010
Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process Models · AAAI 2010
Machine learning and data management
transfer learning
0.112010
The Induction and Transfer of Declarative Bias · AAAI 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
scientific knowledge discovery
0.112006
An interactive environment for the modeling and discovery of scientific knowledge · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.112005
Reducing overfitting in process model induction · ICML 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
process models
0.112005
Inducing Hierarchical Process Models in Dynamic Domains · AAAI 2005
Automated reasoning and model checking › constraint solving
constraint learning
0.012010
Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process Models · AAAI 2010
User interface design and tools
interactive modeling
0.012006
An interactive environment for the modeling and discovery of scientific knowledge · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006
Computational science and engineering
dynamical systems
0.012005
Reducing overfitting in process model induction · ICML 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

DIARC · 1.1ARCADIA · 1.1inductive process modeling · 0.2constraint learning · 0.2supervised learning · 0.1inductive learning · 0.1interactive knowledge modeling · 0.1process model induction · 0.1ensemble learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Novel Architectural Method for Producing Dynamic Gaze Behavior in Human-Robot Interactions
abstract
We present a novel integration between a computational framework for modeling attention-driven perception and cognition (ARCADIA) with a cognitive robotic architecture (DIARC), demonstrating how this integration can be used to drive the gaze behavior of a robotic platform. Although some previous approaches to controlling gaze behavior in robots during human-robot interactions have relied either on models of human visual attention or human cognition, ARCADIA provides a novel framework with an attentional mechanism that bridges both lower-level visual and higher-level cognitive processes. We demonstrate how this approach can produce more natural and human-like robot gaze behavior. In particular, we focus on how our approach can control gaze during an interactive object learning task. We present results from a pilot crowdsourced evaluation that investigates whether the gaze behavior produced during this task increases confidence that the robot has correctly learned each object.
Gordon Briggs, Meia Chita-Tegmark, Evan A. Krause, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello, Matthias Scheutz
HRI4
2021 Selection, Engagement, & Enhancement: A Framework for Modeling Visual Attention
Andrew M. Lovett, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci2
2019 Attentional Capture: Modeling Automatic Mechanisms and Top-Down Control
Andrew M. Lovett, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci2
2018 Time-Based Resource Sharing in ARCADIA
Kevin O'Neill, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci2
2017 A Computational Model of the Role of Attention in Subitizing and Enumeration
Gordon Briggs, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci2
2017 Goal-Directed Deployment of Attention in a Computational Model: A Study in Multiple-Object Tracking
Andrew M. Lovett, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci2
2016 Attentive and Pre-Attentive Processes in Multiple Object Tracking: A Computational Investigation
Paul Bello, Will Bridewell, Christina Wasylyshyn
CogSci2
2016 Inattentional Blindness in a Coupled Perceptual-Cognitive System
Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci1
2015 Incremental Object Perception in an Attention-Driven Cognitive Architecture
Will Bridewell, Paul Bello
CogSci1
2014 Symposium: Creative Cognition
Will Bridewell, Liane Gabora, David Kirsh, Paul Thagard
CogSci1
2012 Discovering Constraints for Inductive Process Modeling
abstract
Scientists use two forms of knowledge in the construction ofexplanatory models: generalized entities and processes that relatethem; and constraints that specify acceptable combinations of thesecomponents. Previous research on inductive process modeling, whichconstructs models from knowledge and time-series data, has relied onhandcrafted constraints. In this paper, we report an approach todiscovering such constraints from a set of models that have beenranked according to their error on observations. Our approach adaptsinductive techniques for supervised learning to identify processcombinations that characterize accurate models. We evaluate themethod's ability to reconstruct known constraints and to generalizewell to other modeling tasks in the same domain. Experiments with synthetic data indicate that the approach can successfully reconstructknown modeling constraints. Another study using natural data suggests that transferring constraints acquired from one modeling scenario to another within the same domain considerably reduces the amount of search for candidate model structures while retaining the most accurate ones.
Ljupco Todorovski, Will Bridewell, Pat Langley
AAAI2
2011 A Computational Account of Everyday Abductive Inference
Will Bridewell, Pat Langley
CogSci1
2010 The Induction and Transfer of Declarative Bias
abstract
People constantly apply acquired knowledge to new learning tasks, but machines almost never do. Research on transfer learning attempts to address this dissimilarity. Working within this area, we report on a procedure that learns and transfers constraints in the context of inductive process modeling, which we review. After discussing the role of constraints in model induction, we describe the learning method, MISC, and introduce our metrics for assessing the cost and benefit of transferred knowledge. The reported results suggest that cross-domain transfer is beneficial in the scenarios that we investigated, lending further evidence that this strategy is a broadly effective means for increasing the efficiency of learning systems. We conclude by discussing the aspects of inductive process modeling that encourage effective transfer, by reviewing related strategies, and by describing future research plans for constraint induction and transfer learning.
Will Bridewell, Ljupco Todorovski
AAAI1
2010 Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process Models
abstract
Quantitative modeling plays a key role in the natural sciences, and systems that address the task of inductive process modeling can assist researchers in explaining their data. In the past, such systems have been limited to data sets that recorded change over time, but many interesting problems involve both spatial and temporal dynamics. To meet this challenge, we introduce SCISM, an integrated intelligent system which solves the task of inducing process models that account for spatial and temporal variation. We also integrate SCISM with a constraint learning method to reduce computation during induction. Applications to ecological modeling demonstrate that each system fares well on the task, but that the enhanced system does so much faster than the baseline version.
Chunki Park, Will Bridewell, Pat Langley
AAAI2
2008 Inductive process modeling
Will Bridewell, Pat Langley, Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski
Mach. Learn.1
2007 Learning Declarative Bias
Will Bridewell, Ljupco Todorovski
ILP1
2007 Extracting constraints for process modeling
abstract
In this paper, we introduce an approach for extracting constraints on process model construction. We begin by clarifying the type of knowledge produced by our method and how one may apply it. Next, we reviewthe task of inductive process modeling, which provides the required data. We then introduce a logical formalismand a computational method for acquiring scientific knowledge from candidate process models. Results suggestthat the learned constraints make sense ecologically and may provide insight into the nature of the modeled domain. We conclude the paper by discussing related and future work.
Will Bridewell, Stuart R. Borrett, Ljupco Todorovski
K-CAP1
2006 Learning Process Models with Missing Data
Will Bridewell, Pat Langley, Stephen A. Racunas, Stuart R. Borrett
ECML1
2006 An interactive environment for the modeling and discovery of scientific knowledge
Will Bridewell, Javier Nicolás Sánchez, Pat Langley, Dorrit Billman
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2005 Inducing Hierarchical Process Models in Dynamic Domains
Ljupco Todorovski, Will Bridewell, Oren Shiran, Pat Langley
AAAI2
2005 Reducing overfitting in process model induction
abstract
In this paper, we review the paradigm of inductive process modeling, which uses background knowledge about possible component processes to construct quantitative models of dynamical systems. We note that previous methods for this task tend to overfit the training data, which suggests ensemble learning as a likely response. However, such techniques combine models in ways that reduce comprehensibility, making their output much less accessible to domain scientists. As an alternative, we introduce a new approach that induces a set of process models from di#erent samples of the training data and uses them to guide a final search through the space of model structures. Experiments with synthetic and natural data suggest this method reduces error and decreases the chance of including unnecessary processes in the model.
Will Bridewell, Narges Bani Asadi, Pat Langley, Ljupco Todorovski
ICML1
2001 Evaluation of negation phrases in narrative clinical reports
Wendy W. Chapman, Will Bridewell, Paul Hanbury, Gregory F. Cooper, Bruce G. Buchanan
AMIA2
2001 A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Negated Findings and Diseases in Discharge Summaries
Wendy W. Chapman, Will Bridewell, Paul Hanbury, Gregory F. Cooper, Bruce G. Buchanan
J. Biomed. Informatics2