Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Will Bridewell
dblp:41/2414
· DBLP profile ↗
23ranked-venue papers
11as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3676-9279ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 9 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 65% Robot navigation and mapping · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 7% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 97% User interface design and tools · 3% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › nonverbal communication
robot gaze behavior |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Novel Architectural Method for Producing Dynamic Gaze Behavior in Human-Robot Interactions · HRI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
constraint discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Discovering Constraints for Inductive Process Modeling · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
model search |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Discovering Constraints for Inductive Process Modeling · AAAI 2012 |
Computational science and engineering › spatial statistics
spatiotemporal modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process Models · AAAI 2010 |
Machine learning and data management
transfer learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Induction and Transfer of Declarative Bias · AAAI 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
scientific knowledge discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | An interactive environment for the modeling and discovery of scientific knowledge · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Reducing overfitting in process model induction · ICML 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
process models |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Inducing Hierarchical Process Models in Dynamic Domains · AAAI 2005 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › constraint solving
constraint learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process Models · AAAI 2010 |
User interface design and tools
interactive modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | An interactive environment for the modeling and discovery of scientific knowledge · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006 |
Computational science and engineering
dynamical systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Reducing overfitting in process model induction · ICML 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
DIARC · 1.1ARCADIA · 1.1inductive process modeling · 0.2constraint learning · 0.2supervised learning · 0.1inductive learning · 0.1interactive knowledge modeling · 0.1process model induction · 0.1ensemble learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Novel Architectural Method for Producing Dynamic Gaze Behavior in Human-Robot InteractionsabstractWe present a novel integration between a computational framework for modeling attention-driven perception and cognition (ARCADIA) with a cognitive robotic architecture (DIARC), demonstrating how this integration can be used to drive the gaze behavior of a robotic platform. Although some previous approaches to controlling gaze behavior in robots during human-robot interactions have relied either on models of human visual attention or human cognition, ARCADIA provides a novel framework with an attentional mechanism that bridges both lower-level visual and higher-level cognitive processes. We demonstrate how this approach can produce more natural and human-like robot gaze behavior. In particular, we focus on how our approach can control gaze during an interactive object learning task. We present results from a pilot crowdsourced evaluation that investigates whether the gaze behavior produced during this task increases confidence that the robot has correctly learned each object. Gordon Briggs, Meia Chita-Tegmark, Evan A. Krause, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello, Matthias Scheutz |
HRI | 4 |
| 2021 | Selection, Engagement, & Enhancement: A Framework for Modeling Visual Attention
Andrew M. Lovett, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2019 | Attentional Capture: Modeling Automatic Mechanisms and Top-Down Control
Andrew M. Lovett, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2018 | Time-Based Resource Sharing in ARCADIA
Kevin O'Neill, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2017 | A Computational Model of the Role of Attention in Subitizing and Enumeration
Gordon Briggs, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2017 | Goal-Directed Deployment of Attention in a Computational Model: A Study in Multiple-Object Tracking
Andrew M. Lovett, Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2016 | Attentive and Pre-Attentive Processes in Multiple Object Tracking: A Computational Investigation
Paul Bello, Will Bridewell, Christina Wasylyshyn |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2016 | Inattentional Blindness in a Coupled Perceptual-Cognitive System
Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2015 | Incremental Object Perception in an Attention-Driven Cognitive Architecture
Will Bridewell, Paul Bello |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2014 | Symposium: Creative Cognition
Will Bridewell, Liane Gabora, David Kirsh, Paul Thagard |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2012 | Discovering Constraints for Inductive Process ModelingabstractScientists use two forms of knowledge in the construction ofexplanatory models: generalized entities and processes that relatethem; and constraints that specify acceptable combinations of thesecomponents. Previous research on inductive process modeling, whichconstructs models from knowledge and time-series data, has relied onhandcrafted constraints. In this paper, we report an approach todiscovering such constraints from a set of models that have beenranked according to their error on observations. Our approach adaptsinductive techniques for supervised learning to identify processcombinations that characterize accurate models. We evaluate themethod's ability to reconstruct known constraints and to generalizewell to other modeling tasks in the same domain. Experiments with synthetic data indicate that the approach can successfully reconstructknown modeling constraints. Another study using natural data suggests that transferring constraints acquired from one modeling scenario to another within the same domain considerably reduces the amount of search for candidate model structures while retaining the most accurate ones. Ljupco Todorovski, Will Bridewell, Pat Langley |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2011 | A Computational Account of Everyday Abductive Inference
Will Bridewell, Pat Langley |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2010 | The Induction and Transfer of Declarative BiasabstractPeople constantly apply acquired knowledge to new learning tasks, but machines almost never do. Research on transfer learning attempts to address this dissimilarity. Working within this area, we report on a procedure that learns and transfers constraints in the context of inductive process modeling, which we review. After discussing the role of constraints in model induction, we describe the learning method, MISC, and introduce our metrics for assessing the cost and benefit of transferred knowledge. The reported results suggest that cross-domain transfer is beneficial in the scenarios that we investigated, lending further evidence that this strategy is a broadly effective means for increasing the efficiency of learning systems. We conclude by discussing the aspects of inductive process modeling that encourage effective transfer, by reviewing related strategies, and by describing future research plans for constraint induction and transfer learning. Will Bridewell, Ljupco Todorovski |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2010 | Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process ModelsabstractQuantitative modeling plays a key role in the natural sciences, and systems that address the task of inductive process modeling can assist researchers in explaining their data. In the past, such systems have been limited to data sets that recorded change over time, but many interesting problems involve both spatial and temporal dynamics. To meet this challenge, we introduce SCISM, an integrated intelligent system which solves the task of inducing process models that account for spatial and temporal variation. We also integrate SCISM with a constraint learning method to reduce computation during induction. Applications to ecological modeling demonstrate that each system fares well on the task, but that the enhanced system does so much faster than the baseline version. Chunki Park, Will Bridewell, Pat Langley |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2008 | Inductive process modeling
Will Bridewell, Pat Langley, Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2007 | Learning Declarative Bias
Will Bridewell, Ljupco Todorovski |
ILP | 1 |
| 2007 | Extracting constraints for process modelingabstractIn this paper, we introduce an approach for extracting constraints on process model construction. We begin by clarifying the type of knowledge produced by our method and how one may apply it. Next, we reviewthe task of inductive process modeling, which provides the required data. We then introduce a logical formalismand a computational method for acquiring scientific knowledge from candidate process models. Results suggestthat the learned constraints make sense ecologically and may provide insight into the nature of the modeled domain. We conclude the paper by discussing related and future work. Will Bridewell, Stuart R. Borrett, Ljupco Todorovski |
K-CAP | 1 |
| 2006 | Learning Process Models with Missing Data
Will Bridewell, Pat Langley, Stephen A. Racunas, Stuart R. Borrett |
ECML | 1 |
| 2006 | An interactive environment for the modeling and discovery of scientific knowledge
Will Bridewell, Javier Nicolás Sánchez, Pat Langley, Dorrit Billman |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |
| 2005 | Inducing Hierarchical Process Models in Dynamic Domains
Ljupco Todorovski, Will Bridewell, Oren Shiran, Pat Langley |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2005 | Reducing overfitting in process model inductionabstractIn this paper, we review the paradigm of inductive process modeling, which uses background knowledge about possible component processes to construct quantitative models of dynamical systems. We note that previous methods for this task tend to overfit the training data, which suggests ensemble learning as a likely response. However, such techniques combine models in ways that reduce comprehensibility, making their output much less accessible to domain scientists. As an alternative, we introduce a new approach that induces a set of process models from di#erent samples of the training data and uses them to guide a final search through the space of model structures. Experiments with synthetic and natural data suggest this method reduces error and decreases the chance of including unnecessary processes in the model. Will Bridewell, Narges Bani Asadi, Pat Langley, Ljupco Todorovski |
ICML | 1 |
| 2001 | Evaluation of negation phrases in narrative clinical reports
Wendy W. Chapman, Will Bridewell, Paul Hanbury, Gregory F. Cooper, Bruce G. Buchanan |
AMIA | 2 |
| 2001 | A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Negated Findings and Diseases in Discharge Summaries
Wendy W. Chapman, Will Bridewell, Paul Hanbury, Gregory F. Cooper, Bruce G. Buchanan |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 2 |