Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Considine

dblp:41/2598 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 77% Medical and health informatics · 23%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.522018
Splice Expression Variation Analysis (SEVA) for inter-tumor heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Medical and health informatics › biomedical data science › cancer informatics
cancer data analysis
0.312018
Splice Expression Variation Analysis (SEVA) for inter-tumor heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis
0.312018
Splice Expression Variation Analysis (SEVA) for inter-tumor heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity
0.312018
Splice Expression Variation Analysis (SEVA) for inter-tumor heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.312017
PatternMarkers & GWCoGAPS for novel data-driven biomarkers via whole transcriptome NMF · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
batch effect correction
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
disease subtype discovery
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery
0.112017
PatternMarkers & GWCoGAPS for novel data-driven biomarkers via whole transcriptome NMF · Bioinform. 2017
Interaction techniques and input
voice interaction
0.012000
The effect of task conditions on the comprehensibility of synthetic speech · CHI 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank-based multivariate statistic · 0.3MCMC · 0.3CoGAPS · 0.3Bayesian NMF · 0.3surrogate variable analysis · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2permutation · 0.2user study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 CancerInSilico: An R/Bioconductor package for combining mathematical and statistical modeling to simulate time course bulk and single cell gene expression data in cancer
abstract
Bioinformatics techniques to analyze time course bulk and single cell omics data are advancing. The absence of a known ground truth of the dynamics of molecular changes challenges benchmarking their performance on real data. Realistic simulated time-course datasets are essential to assess the performance of time course bioinformatics algorithms. We develop an R/Bioconductor package, CancerInSilico, to simulate bulk and single cell transcriptional data from a known ground truth obtained from mathematical models of cellular systems. This package contains a general R infrastructure for running cell-based models and simulating gene expression data based on the model states. We show how to use this package to simulate a gene expression data set and consequently benchmark analysis methods on this data set with a known ground truth. The package is freely available via Bioconductor: http://bioconductor.org/packages/CancerInSilico/.
Thomas Sherman, Luciane T. Kagohara, Raymon Cao, Matthew Satriano, Michael Considine, Gabriel Krigsfeld, Ruchira Ranaweera, Sandra A. Jablonski, Genevieve L. Stein-O'Brien, Daria A. Gaykalova, Louis M. Weiner, Christine H. Chung, Elana J. Fertig
PLoS Comput. Biol.6
2018 Splice Expression Variation Analysis (SEVA) for inter-tumor heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in cancer
abstract
Motivation: Current bioinformatics methods to detect changes in gene isoform usage in distinct phenotypes compare the relative expected isoform usage in phenotypes. These statistics model differences in isoform usage in normal tissues, which have stable regulation of gene splicing. Pathological conditions, such as cancer, can have broken regulation of splicing that increases the heterogeneity of the expression of splice variants. Inferring events with such differential heterogeneity in gene isoform usage requires new statistical approaches. Results: We introduce Splice Expression Variability Analysis (SEVA) to model increased heterogeneity of splice variant usage between conditions (e.g. tumor and normal samples). SEVA uses a rank-based multivariate statistic that compares the variability of junction expression profiles within one condition to the variability within another. Simulated data show that SEVA is unique in modeling heterogeneity of gene isoform usage, and benchmark SEVA's performance against EBSeq, DiffSplice and rMATS that model differential isoform usage instead of heterogeneity. We confirm the accuracy of SEVA in identifying known splice variants in head and neck cancer and perform cross-study validation of novel splice variants. A novel comparison of splice variant heterogeneity between subtypes of head and neck cancer demonstrated unanticipated similarity between the heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in HPV-positive and HPV-negative subtypes and anticipated increased heterogeneity among HPV-negative samples with mutations in genes that regulate the splice variant machinery. These results show that SEVA accurately models differential heterogeneity of gene isoform usage from RNA-seq data. Availability and implementation: SEVA is implemented in the R/Bioconductor package GSReg. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bahman Afsari, Theresa Guo, Michael Considine, Liliana Florea, Luciane T. Kagohara, Genevieve L. Stein-O'Brien, Dylan Kelley, Emily Flam, Kristina D. Zambo, Patrick K. Ha, Donald Geman, Michael F. Ochs, Joseph A. Califano, Daria A. Gaykalova, Alexander V. Favorov, Elana J. Fertig
Bioinform.3
2017 PatternMarkers & GWCoGAPS for novel data-driven biomarkers via whole transcriptome NMF
abstract
SUMMARY: Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) algorithms associate gene expression with biological processes (e.g. time-course dynamics or disease subtypes). Compared with univariate associations, the relative weights of NMF solutions can obscure biomarkers. Therefore, we developed a novel patternMarkers statistic to extract genes for biological validation and enhanced visualization of NMF results. Finding novel and unbiased gene markers with patternMarkers requires whole-genome data. Therefore, we also developed Genome-Wide CoGAPS Analysis in Parallel Sets (GWCoGAPS), the first robust whole genome Bayesian NMF using the sparse, MCMC algorithm, CoGAPS. Additionally, a manual version of the GWCoGAPS algorithm contains analytic and visualization tools including patternMatcher, a Shiny web application. The decomposition in the manual pipeline can be replaced with any NMF algorithm, for further generalization of the software. Using these tools, we find granular brain-region and cell-type specific signatures with corresponding biomarkers in GTEx data, illustrating GWCoGAPS and patternMarkers ascertainment of data-driven biomarkers from whole-genome data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PatternMarkers & GWCoGAPS are in the CoGAPS Bioconductor package (3.5) under the GPL license. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Genevieve L. Stein-O'Brien, Jacob L. Carey, Waishing Lee, Michael Considine, Alexander V. Favorov, Emily Flam, Theresa Guo, Luigi Marchionni, Thomas Sherman, Shawn Sivy, Daria A. Gaykalova, Ronald McKay, Michael F. Ochs, Carlo Colantuoni, Elana J. Fertig
Bioinform.4
2014 Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Sample source, procurement process and other technical variations introduce batch effects into genomics data. Algorithms to remove these artifacts enhance differences between known biological covariates, but also carry potential concern of removing intragroup biological heterogeneity and thus any personalized genomic signatures. As a result, accurate identification of novel subtypes from batch-corrected genomics data is challenging using standard algorithms designed to remove batch effects for class comparison analyses. Nor can batch effects be corrected reliably in future applications of genomics-based clinical tests, in which the biological groups are by definition unknown a priori. RESULTS: Therefore, we assess the extent to which various batch correction algorithms remove true biological heterogeneity. We also introduce an algorithm, permuted-SVA (pSVA), using a new statistical model that is blind to biological covariates to correct for technical artifacts while retaining biological heterogeneity in genomic data. This algorithm facilitated accurate subtype identification in head and neck cancer from gene expression data in both formalin-fixed and frozen samples. When applied to predict Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status, pSVA improved cross-study validation even if the sample batches were highly confounded with HPV status in the training set. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All analyses were performed using R version 2.15.0. The code and data used to generate the results of this manuscript is available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/psva.
Hilary S. Parker, Jeffrey T. Leek, Alexander V. Favorov, Michael Considine, Xiaoxin Xia, Sameer Chavan, Christine H. Chung, Elana J. Fertig
Bioinform.4
2014 Outlier Analysis and Top Scoring Pairfor Integrated Data Analysisand Biomarker Discovery
abstract
Pathway deregulation has been identified as a key driver of carcinogenesis, with proteins in signaling pathways serving as primary targets for drug development. Deregulation can be driven by a number of molecular events, including gene mutation, epigenetic changes in gene promoters, overexpression, and gene amplifications or deletions. We demonstrate a novel approach that identifies pathways of interest by integrating outlier analysis within and across molecular data types with gene set analysis. We use the results to seed the top-scoring pair algorithm to identify robust biomarkers associated with pathway deregulation. We demonstrate this methodology on pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) data. We develop a biomarker in primary AML tumors, demonstrate robustness with an independent primary tumor data set, and show that the identified biomarkers also function well in relapsed pediatric AML tumors.
Michael F. Ochs, Jason E. Farrar, Michael Considine, Soheil Meschinchi, Robert J. Arceci
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.3
2000 The effect of task conditions on the comprehensibility of synthetic speech
abstract
A study was conducted with 78 subjects to evaluate the comprehensibility of synthetic speech for various tasks ranging from short, simple e-mail messages to longer news articles on mostly obscure topics. Comprehension accuracy for each subject was measured for synthetic speech and for recorded human speech. Half the subjects were allowed to take notes while listening, the other half were not. Findings show that there was no significant difference in comprehension of synthetic speech among the five different text-to-speech engines used. Those subjects that did not take notes performed significantly worse for all synthetic voice tasks when compared to recorded speech tasks. Performance for synthetic speech in the non note-taking condition degraded as the task got longer and more complex. When taking notes, subjects also did significantly worse within the synthetic voice condition averaged across all six tasks. However, average performance scores for the last three tasks in this condition show comparable results for human and synthetic speech, reflective of a training effect.
Jennifer Lai, Michael Considine
CHI3