Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

L. Csanky

dblp:41/2965 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
linear system solving
0.021976
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1976
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · FOCS 1975
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › generalized inverse
matrix inversion
0.021976
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1976
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · FOCS 1975
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.011976
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1976
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
determinant computation
0.011975
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · FOCS 1975
Algorithms and data structures
parallel algorithms
0.011975
Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms · FOCS 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel arithmetic complexity analysis · 0.0processor bounds · 0.0parallel arithmetic complexity · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms
abstract
The parallel arithmetic complexities of matrix inversion, solving systems of linear equations, computing determinants and computing the characteristic polynomial of a matrix are shown to have the same growth rate. Algorithms are given that compute these problems in $O(\log ^2 n)$ steps using a number of processors polynomial in n. (n is the order of the matrix of the problem.)
L. Csanky
SIAM J. Comput.1
1975 Fast Parallel Matrix Inversion Algorithms
abstract
In this paper, an investigation of the parallel arithmetic complexity of matrix inversion, solving systems of linear equations, computing determinants and computing the characteristic polynomial of a matrix is reported. The parallel arithmetic complexity of solving equations has been an open question for several years. The gap between the complexity of the best algorithms (2n + 0(1), where n is the number of unknowns/ equations) and the only proved lower bound (2 log n (All logarithms in this paper are of base two.)) was huge. The first breakthrough came when Csanky reported that the parallel arithmetic complexity of all these four problems has the same growth rate and exhibited an algorithm that computes these problems in 2n - O(log2n) steps. It will be shown in the sequel that the parallel arithmetic complexity of all these four problems is upper bounded by O(log2n) and the algorithms that establish this bound use a number of processors polynomial in n. This disproves I. Munro's conjecture.
L. Csanky
FOCS1