Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dennis Benigno

dblp:41/3214 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 44% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44% User interface design and tools · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
augmentative and alternative communication
0.012001
Improving the performance of the cyberlink mental interface with "yes / no program" · CHI 2001
Wearable and physiological sensing
brain-computer interface
0.012001
Improving the performance of the cyberlink mental interface with "yes / no program" · CHI 2001
User interface design and tools › design guidelines
interaction design guidelines
0.012001
Improving the performance of the cyberlink mental interface with "yes / no program" · CHI 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative design · 0.0focus groups · 0.0contextual inquiry · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Improving the performance of the cyberlink mental interface with "yes / no program"
abstract
We summarise the results of the first studies to investigate the Cyberlink brain body interface as an assistive technology. Three phases of studies and a contextual inquiry were performed with a range of users. A focus group was formed from brain-injured users with locked-in syndrome who have no other method of communication or control of a computer than the Cyberlink. Versions of a Yes/No program were then created to allow communication and have achieved some success with the focus group. The purpose of this paper is to discuss how this program has been improved and what steps need to be taken to create communication programs for persons with severe motor impairment. As a result of our experiences, we have been able to develop a set of design guidelines for brain-body interface operated Yes/No programs. These are presented and justified on the basis of our experiences. We also raise some general issues for assistive technologies of this nature.
Eamon P. Doherty, Gilbert Cockton, Chris Bloor, Dennis Benigno
CHI4