Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Graham Russell
dblp:41/3402
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 54% Information extraction and text analysis · 31% Language models and text generation · 16% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › description logic › taxonomic reasoning
inheritance |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon · ACL 1991 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › defeasible reasoning
inheritance with exceptions |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon · ACL 1991 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › constraint-based grammar
unification-based grammar |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon · ACL 1991 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Asymmetry in Parsing and Generating with Unification Grammars: Case Studies from ELU · ACL 1990 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
unification-based parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Asymmetry in Parsing and Generating with Unification Grammars: Case Studies from ELU · ACL 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unification-based grammar · 0.0multiple inheritance · 0.0unification grammar · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Statistical machine translation: rapid development with limited resourcesabstractWe describe an experiment in rapid development of a statistical machine translation (SMT) system from scratch, using limited resources: under this heading we include not only training data, but also computing power, linguistic knowledge, programming effort, and absolute time. George F. Foster, Simona Gandrabur, Philippe Langlais, Pierre Plamondon, Graham Russell, Michel Simard |
MTSummit | 5 |
| 1994 | LHIP: Extended DCGs for Configurable Robust Parsing
Afzal Ballim, Graham Russell |
COLING | 2 |
| 1992 | A Practical Approach to Multiple Default Inheritance for Unification-Based Lexicons
Graham Russell, Afzal Ballim, John Carroll 0001, Susan Warwick-Armstrong |
Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 1991 | Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based LexiconabstractA formalism is presented for lexical specification in unification-based grammars which exploits defeasible multiple inheritance to express regularity, sub-regularity, and exceptions in classifying the properties of words. Such systems are in the general case intractable; the present proposal represents an attempt to reduce complexity while retaining sufficient expressive power for the task at hand. Illustrative examples are given of morphological analyses from English and German. Graham Russell, John Carroll 0001, Susan Warwick-Armstrong |
ACL | 1 |
| 1991 | A Language for the Statement of Binary Relations over Feature Structures
Graham Russell, Afzal Ballim, Dominique Estival, Susan Warwick-Armstrong |
EACL | 1 |
| 1990 | Asymmetry in Parsing and Generating with Unification Grammars: Case Studies from ELUabstractRecent developments in generation algorithms have enabled work in unification-based computational linguistics to approach more closely the ideal of grammars as declarative statements of linguistic facts, neutral between analysis and synthesis. From this perspective, however, the situation is still far from perfect; all known methods of generation impose constraints on the grammars they assume.We briefly consider a number of proposals for generation, outlining their consequences for the form of grammars, and then report on experience arising from the addition of a generator to an existing unification environment. The algorithm in question (based on that of Shieber et al. (1989)), though among the most permissive currently available, excludes certain classes of parsable analyses. Graham Russell, Susan Warwick-Armstrong, John Carroll 0001 |
ACL | 1 |
| 1988 | Book reviews
Glyn Morrill, Peter Lau, George Dunbar, Lee Fedder, Robert E. Frederking, Danny Jones, John S. White, Christoph Zähner, Graham Russell |
Mach. Transl. | 10 |
| 1988 | Book reviews
Glyn Morrill, John S. White, Christoph Zähner, Graham Russell |
Mach. Transl. | 4 |
| 1987 | Formalisms For Morphographemic Description
Alan W. Black, Graeme D. Ritchie, Stephen G. Pulman, Graham Russell |
EACL | 4 |
| 1987 | A Computational Framework for Lexical Description
Graeme D. Ritchie, Stephen G. Pulman, Alan W. Black, Graham Russell |
Comput. Linguistics | 4 |
| 1986 | A Dictionary and Morphological Analyser for English
Graham Russell, Stephen G. Pulman, Graeme D. Ritchie, Alan W. Black |
COLING | 1 |