Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David T. Miller

dblp:41/4024 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
0000-0003-1060-1945ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 10

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.041992
Dynamic redundancy identification in automatic test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Freeze!: A New Approach for Testing Sequential Circuits · DAC 1992
Checkpoint Faults are not Sufficient Target Faults for Test Generation · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.031992
Dynamic redundancy identification in automatic test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Freeze!: A New Approach for Testing Sequential Circuits · DAC 1992
Checkpoint Faults are not Sufficient Target Faults for Test Generation · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
combinational circuit testing
0.011992
Dynamic redundancy identification in automatic test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation
redundancy identification
0.011992
Dynamic redundancy identification in automatic test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing
0.011992
Freeze!: A New Approach for Testing Sequential Circuits · DAC 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault simulation
critical path tracing
0.011983
Critical path tracing - an alternative to fault simulation · DAC 1983
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation
0.011983
Critical path tracing - an alternative to fault simulation · DAC 1983
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault diagnosis
0.011983
Critical path tracing - an alternative to fault simulation · DAC 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-covering relation · 0.0freeze-based test generation · 0.0dynamic redundancy identification · 0.0stuck-at fault analysis · 0.0critical path tracing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Freeze!: A New Approach for Testing Sequential Circuits
Miron Abramovici, Krishna B. Rajan, David T. Miller
DAC3
1992 Dynamic redundancy identification in automatic test generation
abstract
Test generation for combinational circuits, an NP-complete problem, shows its worst-case behavior while trying to generate tests for redundant faults and failing after an exhaustive search. The performance of an automatic test generator can be significantly improved by identifying redundancy via simple techniques which do not involve a search. The authors present a technique to identify redundant faults. This technique works dynamically during test generation, but is not based on a search process. It relies on test-covering relations among faults, which allow identification of addition redundant faults after the test generator fails to generate a test for a target fault. This technique has been implemented in AT&T's Testpilot test generation system and has shown a reduction of up to 32% in the number of backtracks in test generation runs.>
Miron Abramovici, David T. Miller, Rabindra K. Roy
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
1990 Global cost functions for test generation
abstract
The authors present a new cost function (GLOBAL) which is used to guide the decision process in test generation algorithms. By analyzing the global fanout structure of the circuit, GLOBAL guides the search for a test toward decisions that are least likely to result in conflict. The results obtained indicate that GLOBAL is a consistently superior guidance heuristic for test generation. Compared with previous cost functions, it provides greater fault coverage in approximately the same number of tests and usually in less CPU time. It appears to be more consistent and hence it can be reliably used on large circuits. GLOBAL identifies both lines whose justification is conflict free and lines whose justification is likely to lead to conflicts. Although its worst-case complexity is exponential in the number of stems, the analysis done by GLOBAL is performed only once, while its results are used at every decision step of an algorithm with a similar worst-case behavior. The results show that the time gained in test generation usually outweighs the time spent in preprocessing.>
Miron Abramovici, David T. Miller, R. Henning
ITC2
1989 Dynamic redundancy identification in automatic test generation
abstract
The performance of an automatic test generator can be significantly improved by identifying redundancy by simple techniques which do not involve search. The authors present a technique for identifying redundant faults. This technique works dynamically during test generation but is not based on a search process. It exploits dominance and test-covering relations among faults, which allow identification of additional redundant faults after the test generator fails to generate a test for a target fault. This technique has been implemented in AT&T's LTG (LAMP2 test generation) system and has shown up to 32% reduction in the number of backtracks in test generation runs.>
Miron Abramovici, David T. Miller, Rabindra K. Roy
ICCAD2
1989 System-level design verification in the AT&T computer division: overview and strategy
abstract
The authors present the experience and strategy guiding the system-level computer-aided design verification (CADV) process used in the AT&T computer division. Specifically, they provide an overview of processes, results, and the strategy used to choose among modeling options, styles for the verification process, methods for test development, timing models, and techniques for analyzing results. CADV is now being used on ten active projects. The use of CADV has reduced the number of circuit board artmaster cycles required to produce a high-quality design for high-volume manufacture from an average of 3.5 to 4 cycles to an average of 2 cycles. >
Miron Abramovici, J. W. Bierbauer, R. H. Hellman, C. L. Hong, David T. Miller, R. G. Taylor
ICCD5
1989 System-level design verification in the AT&T Computer Division: tools
abstract
The authors present the CAD tools used for system-level design verification (DV) in the AT&T computer division. They discuss features of the tools for building and preparing the model of the system, developing tests, simulation, static timing analysis, results analysis, and circuit comparison. While a good simulator is an essential component, many other tools are required. Although some of them provide only relatively minor capabilities, together they form an integrated set of tools that greatly simplify the designers' work and make possible successful completion of system-level DV projects.>
Miron Abramovici, James J. Kulikowski, David T. Miller, Prem R. Menon
ICCD3
1986 Checkpoint Faults are not Sufficient Target Faults for Test Generation
abstract
Stuck-at faults on primary inputs and fan-out branches are commonly used as target faults in test generation algorithms for combinational circuits. This correspondence shows that these faults may not constitute an adequate set of target faults. A procedure is presented for selecting a set of target faults with the property that the detection of all detectable faults from this set guarantees the detection of all detectable faults in the circuit.
Miron Abramovici, Prem R. Menon, David T. Miller
IEEE Trans. Computers3
1985 Test Generation In Lamp2: System Overview
Miron Abramovici, James J. Kulikowski, Prem R. Menon, David T. Miller
ITC4
1985 Test Generation In Lamp2: Concepts and Algorithms
Miron Abramovici, James J. Kulikowski, Prem R. Menon, David T. Miller
ITC4
1983 Critical path tracing - an alternative to fault simulation
Miron Abramovici, Prem R. Menon, David T. Miller
DAC3